WebAuthn library for elixir
Goal: implement a comprehensive FIDO2 library on the server side (Relying party or RP in the WebAuthn terminology) to authenticate users with WebAuthn.
For semantics (FIDO2, WebAuthn, FIDO...), read this article
You can try out and study WebAuthn authentication with Wax thanks to the wax_demo test application.
See also a video demonstration of an authentication flow which allows replacing the password authentication scheme by a WebAuthn password-less authentication:
- Support the FIDO2 standard (especially all types of attestation statement formats and all mandatory algorithms). See the "Support of FIDO2" section for further information
- Passes all the 170 tests of the official test suite (tested using WaxFidoTestSuiteServer)
- This library has not be reviewed by independent security / FIDO2 specialists - use it at your own risks or blindly trust its author!
- This library does not come with a javascript library to handle WebAuthn calls
OTP25+
Add the following line to your list of dependencies in mix.exs
:
def deps do
[
{:wax_, "~> 0.6.0"}
]
end
Note that due to a name collision, the application
name is :wax_
, and not :wax
. It doesn't cause issues using both library because the other's
package doesn't use the atom Wax
as the base module name.
To use FIDO2 for authentication, you must first register a new FIDO2 key for a user. The process is therefore the following:
- Register a FIDO2 key for a user
- Authenticate as much as you want the user using the FIDO2 key registered in step 1
Optionaly, you might want to store more than one key, for instance if the user have several authenticators.
The Wax library doesn't provide with a user data store to store the key generated in step
1 and to retrieve it in step 2. Instead, it lets you use any data store. The data to
be stored is described in the Wax
module's documentation.
Wax provides with 2 functions for registration:
Wax.new_registration_challenge/1
: generates a challenge that must subsequently be sent to the client for use by the javascript WebAuthn APIWax.register/3
: takes into parameter the response of the WebAuthn javascript API and the challenge generated in step 1, and verifies it
Since the challenge generated in step 1 must be passed as a parameter in step 2, it is required to persist it on the server side, for instance in the session:
# generating a challenge
challenge = Wax.new_registration_challenge()
conn
|> put_session(:challenge, challenge)
|> render(register_key_page, challenge: challenge.bytes)
# the challenge is to be sent on the client one way or another
# this can be direct within the HTML, or using an API call
to be then retrieved when verifying the assertion:
challenge = get_session(conn, :challenge)
case Wax.register(attestation_object, client_data_json, challenge) do
{:ok, {authenticator_data, attestation_result}} ->
# success case
{:error, e} ->
# verification failure
end
In the success case, a server will save the credential id (generated by the WebAuthn javascript call) and the cose key in its user database for use for authentication.
Authenticator data contains the COSE key generated by the authenticator, which can be
found in authenticator_data.attested_credential_data.credential_public_key
:
%{
-3 => <<182, 81, 183, 218, 92, 107, 106, 120, 60, 51, 75, 104, 141, 130,
119, 232, 34, 245, 84, 203, 246, 165, 148, 179, 169, 31, 205, 126, 241,
188, 241, 176>>,
-2 => <<89, 29, 193, 225, 4, 234, 101, 162, 32, 6, 15, 14, 130, 179, 223,
207, 53, 2, 134, 184, 178, 127, 51, 145, 57, 180, 104, 242, 138, 96, 27,
221>>,
-1 => 1,
1 => 2,
3 => -7
}
It probably doesn't need to be searchable or indexed, which is why one can store as a binary.
To convert back and forth Elixir data structures to binary and store the keys in a database
(SQL, for instance), take a look at the Erlang functions :erlang.term_to_binary/1
and
:erlang.binary_to_term/1
.
For further information, refer to the Wax
module documentation.
The process is quite similar, with 2 functions for authentication:
Wax.new_authentication_challenge/1
: generates a challenge from a list of{credential id, key}
saved during the registration processes. It also has to be sent to the client for use by the javascript WebAuthn APIWax.authenticate/5
: to be called to verify the WebAuthn javascript API response with the returned data (composed of signature, authenticator data, etc.) with the challenge generated in step 1
This also requires storing the challenge:
cred_ids_and_keys = UserStore.get_keys(username)
challenge = Wax.new_authentication_challenge(allow_credentials: cred_ids_and_keys)
conn
|> put_session(:authentication_challenge, challenge)
|> render(auth_verify_page, challenge: challenge.bytes, creds: cred_ids_and_keys)
# the challenge is to be sent on the client one way or another
# this can be direct within the HTML, or using an API call
to be passed as a paramter to the Wax.authenticate/5
function:
challenge = get_session(conn, :authentication_challenge)
case Wax.authenticate(raw_id, authenticator_data, sig, client_data_json, challenge) do
{:ok, _} ->
# ok, user authenticated
{:error, _} ->
# invalid WebAuthn response
end
For further information, refer to the Wax
module documentation.
The options are set when generating the challenge (for both registration and authentication). Options can be configured either globally in the configuration file or when generating the challenge. Some also have default values.
Option values set during challenge generation take precedence over globally configured options, which takes precedence over default values.
These options are:
Option | Type | Applies to | Default value | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
attestation |
"none" or "direct" |
registration | "none" |
|
origin |
String.t() |
registration & authentication | Mandatory. Example: https://www.example.com |
|
rp_id |
String.t() or :auto |
registration & authentication | If set to :auto , automatically determined from the origin (set to the host) |
With :auto , it defaults to the full host (e.g.: www.example.com ). This option allow you to set the rp_id to another valid value (e.g.: example.com ) |
user_verification |
"discouraged" , "preferred" or "required" |
registration & authentication | "preferred" |
|
trusted_attestation_types |
[t:Wax.Attestation.type/0] |
registration | [:none, :basic, :uncertain, :attca, :anonca, :self] |
|
verify_trust_root |
boolean() |
registration | true |
Only for u2f and packed attestation. tpm attestation format is always checked against metadata |
acceptable_authenticator_statuses |
[String.t()] |
registration | ["FIDO_CERTIFIED", "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L1", "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L1plus", "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L2", "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L2plus", "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L3", "FIDO_CERTIFIED_L3plus"] |
The "UPDATE_AVAILABLE" status is not whitelisted by default |
timeout |
non_neg_integer() |
registration & authentication | 20 * 60 |
The validity duration of a challenge, in seconds |
android_key_allow_software_enforcement |
boolean() |
registration | false |
When registration is a Android key, determines whether software enforcement is acceptable (true ) or only hardware enforcement is (false ) |
silent_authentication_enabled |
boolean() |
authentication | false |
See fido-alliance/conformance-test-tools-resources#434 |
If you use attestation, you need to enabled metadata.
This is the official metadata service of the FIDO foundation.
Set the :update_metadata
environment variable to true
and metadata will load
automatically through HTTP from
https://mds3.fidoalliance.org/.
In addition to the FIDO2 metadata service, it is possible to load metadata from a directory.
To do so, the :metadata_dir
application environment variable must be set to one of:
- a
String.t()
: the path to the directory containing the metadata files - an
atom()
: in this case, the files are loaded from the"fido2_metadata"
directory of the private ("priv/"
) directory of the application (whose name is the atom)
In both case, Wax tries to load all files (even directories and other special files).
config :wax_,
origin: "http://localhost:4000",
rp_id: :auto,
metadata_dir: :my_application
will try to load all files of the "priv/fido2_metadata/"
of the :my_application
as FIDO2
metadata statements. On failure, a warning is emitted.
- Make sure to understand the implications of not using attested credentials before
accepting
none
orself
attestation types, or disabling it forpacked
andu2f
formats by disabling it with theverify_trust_root
option - This library has not be reviewed by independent security / FIDO2 specialists - use it at your own risks or blindly trust its author! If you're knowledgeable about FIDO2 and willing to help reviewing it, please contact the author
See CHANGELOG.md.
2. Registration and Attestations
- Mandatory: registration support
- Mandatory: random challenge
- 2.1. Validating Attestation
- Mandatory: attestation validation
- Mandatory: attestation certificate chains (note: can be disabled through an option)
- Mandatory: validation of attestation through the FIDO Metadata Service
- 2.2. Attestation Types
- Mandatory: basic attestation
- Mandatory: self attestation
- Mandatory: private CA attestation
- Optional: elliptic curve direct anonymous attestation
- 2.3. Attestation Formats
- Mandatory: packed attestation
- Mandatory: TPM attestation
- Optional: Android key attestation
- Mandatory: U2F attestation
- Mandatory: Android Safetynet attestation
- Mandatory: Apple Anonymous
3. Authentication and Assertions
- Mandatory: authentication
- Mandatory: random challenge
- Mandatory: assertion signature validation
- Mandatory: TUP verification (note: and also user verified, through an option)
4. Communication Channel Requirements
- Optional: TokenBinding support (won't be supported following Chrome drop of the now dead token binding standard)
- Mandatory: registration and authentication support without extension
- Optional: extension support
- Optional: appid extension support
- Mandatory: RS1 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-1) algorithm support
- Mandatory: RS256 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-256) algorithm support
- Optional: RS384 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-384) algorithm support
- Optional: RS512 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-512) algorithm support
- Optional: PS256 (RSASSA-PSS w/ SHA-256) algorithm support
- Optional: PS384 (RSASSA-PSS w/ SHA-384) algorithm support
- Optional: PS512 (RSASSA-PSS w/ SHA-512) algorithm support
- Mandatory: ES256 (ECDSA using P-256 and SHA-256) algorithm support
- Optional: ES384 (ECDSA using P-384 and SHA-384) algorithm support
- Optional: ES512 (ECDSA using P-521 and SHA-512) algorithm support
- Optional: EdDSA algorithm support
- Optional: ES256K (ECDSA using P-256K and SHA-256) algorithm support
- Mandatory: compliance with the FIDO privacy principles (note: out-of-scope, to be implemented by the server using the Wax library)
- optional: API implementation (
WaxAPIRest
)
3.1.8 Metadata TOC object processing rules
- TOC verification against the
x5u
attribute (note: doesn't seem to be used) - TOC verification against the
x5c
attribute - TOC CRLs verification
- Loading and verification of metadata statements against the hased value of the TOC
- Handling of the status of the authenticator (through whitelisting, see the
:acceptable_authenticator_statuses
option)