-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Track Stitching #65
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Track Stitching #65
Conversation
… of `typing.Union` and referring to standard collections directly rather than `typing.Collection`
* replace print statements and warnings with logger emissions * get rid of unnecessary/commented out exceptions/print statements
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
0a30ec1
to
e60afb5
Compare
Here we implement an alternative approach to frame by frame tracking where we stitch trackkets together. This assumes that we already have tracklets stored as a labels file (can be generated by DREEM or another trakcing approach). Then we query a tracklet backwards in time against the stitched tracklets by reducing the association matrix from n_query x total_instances -> n_traj x n_traj and propogate labels forward