-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
Add missing layer(…) to imports above Tailwind directives
#14982
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
RobinMalfait
merged 8 commits into
next
from
fix/missing-layer-above-tailwind-directives
Nov 14, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
706408f
add failing test
RobinMalfait dede58d
use Stylesheets containing `@utility`
RobinMalfait 8a4db94
add `layer(…)` to `@import` at-rules when necessary
RobinMalfait 7a41b4e
update changelog
RobinMalfait b62c499
root files don't need to be split
RobinMalfait 87c0bb2
update integration tests
RobinMalfait 6645a13
improve sheet splitting
RobinMalfait 679295e
update integration tests with improved logic
RobinMalfait File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has
layer(components)because this is coming from the components file where nothing sits above it (in that file), but there is a@layer componentsand@tailwind componentsbelow it.if we want to look at as-if it was flattened, then it exists between
baseandcomponents. This means that if this code existed in the same file we would've generatedlayer(base)instead. 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is also what we get on the Commit template with this PR:

Without knowing the rest of the files, it looks correct. But I wonder if
layer(base)is more correct.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Talked with @philipp-spiess and @thecrypticace and we came to the conclusion that this is the least surprising outcome where you look at CSS files in isolation.