-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Typo fix #28
Typo fix #28
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@tankerkiller125 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 36 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent update pertains to a minor correction in the documentation within Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/index.md (3)
Line range hint
37-37
: Consider adding a comma after "general" for better readability.- In general idle memory usage is less than 50MB for the whole container. + In general, idle memory usage is less than 50MB for the whole container.
Line range hint
51-51
: The repetitive use of "I also wanted" could be streamlined for better flow. Consider revising this section to avoid redundancy and enhance readability.- I also wanted to be able to search and filter my data in a more robust way than a spreadsheet can provide. I also wanted to leave the door open for more advanced features in the future like maintenance logs, moving label generators, and more. + I wanted not only to search and filter my data more robustly than a spreadsheet allows but also to keep options open for future enhancements like maintenance logs and moving label generators.
Line range hint
44-44
: Please remove the extra blank line to adhere to Markdown best practices.-
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/index.md (2 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
docs/index.md
[uncategorized] ~37-~37: A comma might be missing here. (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
Context: ...equires minimal resources to deploy. In general idle memory usage is less than 50MB for...
[style] ~51-~51: To elevate your writing, try using a synonym here. (HARD_TO)
Context: ...y when you have a lot of data, and it's hard to keep track of what's where. I also w...
[style] ~51-~51: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
Context: ...ust way than a spreadsheet can provide. I also wanted to leave the door open for ...
Markdownlint
docs/index.md
44-44: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
Additional comments not posted (1)
docs/index.md (1)
27-27
: The typo correction from "bill of mertials" to "bill of materials" is precise and improves the clarity of the documentation. Well done on catching that!
Mertials > Materials
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes a typo in the documentation
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
(REQUIRED)
Special notes for your reviewer:
(fill-in or delete this section)
Testing
(fill-in or delete this section)
Release Notes
(REQUIRED)
Summary by CodeRabbit