Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for executing agent-local workloads #325

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kthomas
Copy link
Contributor

@kthomas kthomas commented Jul 12, 2024

This PR allows the workload deploy location to be specified using a file:// or nats:// URL scheme.

File-based deploy locations are treated as "agent-local" workload deploy requests, meaning the agent will attempt to resolve the named file as an executable installed on its rootfs. File-based workload deploy requests can only be executed in sandbox mode.

@kthomas kthomas requested a review from a team as a code owner July 12, 2024 19:42
@kthomas kthomas force-pushed the feat/agent-local-workloads-rebased branch from 2d4014a to 20ce7f5 Compare July 12, 2024 19:47
@kthomas kthomas force-pushed the feat/agent-local-workloads-rebased branch 5 times, most recently from 2de919f to 501ce3c Compare August 5, 2024 16:18
Workload deploy location can be specified with file:// or nats://
schemes. File-based deploy locations are treated as "agent-local"
workload deploy requests, meaning the agent will attempt to resolve the
file as an executable installed on its rootfs. File-based workload
deploy requests can only be executed in sandbox mode.
@kthomas kthomas force-pushed the feat/agent-local-workloads-rebased branch from 307bfbc to d40d358 Compare August 5, 2024 20:35
@autodidaddict
Copy link
Contributor

This is still something that needs to be behind a feature/configuration flag that defaults to off/unsupported.

@kthomas kthomas closed this Sep 26, 2024
@kthomas kthomas deleted the feat/agent-local-workloads-rebased branch September 26, 2024 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants