-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
[windows] add Embeddable Python 3.10.1 to build.ps1 #83488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
charles-zablit
wants to merge
1
commit into
swiftlang:main
Choose a base branch
from
charles-zablit:charles-zablit/windows/upgrade-python-to-3.10
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+50
−7
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Again, is there a bigger picture around the embedded vs non-embedded python that the extraction needs special logic?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only reason is
pipmissing in embeddedable python. We build with the regular Python, but we bundle the embeddable python in the installer.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There-in lies the trick! We can inject
pipinto the packaging :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think injecting
pipwould work well because of this SO comment, especially because the Python documentation explicitly states:Given that, and the extra steps it would take to manually install
pipwith the embeddable python, I think it's simpler to:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that we should just use a boolean state on the known dictionary rather than extract this. Overall, I'd like to see the python distribution to be complete enough for use in scripting (i.e. has
pip).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I understand what that boolean state would look like: would it be something like
hasPip?I agree that it would be more convenient, however in that case, why not package a complete Python install?
pipis not supported by embeddable Python: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/83488/files#r2254566330.I see the Embeddable Python in the installer feature as a way for users to get a functional
lldbwhether they have the correct Python version installed or not. This is the main source of confusion for users: llvm/llvm-project#74073 (comment)I think it's reasonable to expect power users who want to have scripting features to install Python themselves and have proper
pipsupport rather than to risk usingpipin an unsupported way with Embeddable Python.