Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add description for constellation identifier to bounds messages [OC-1087] #1407

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

IsakTjernberg
Copy link
Contributor

@IsakTjernberg IsakTjernberg commented Mar 20, 2024

Description

Add description for what the constellation identifier means in the orbit&clock bounds, code&phase biases bounds, orbit&clock bounds degradations messages.

API compatibility

Does this change introduce a API compatibility risk?

No, it's just adding clarifying documentation to the SBP spec.

JIRA Reference

https://swift-nav.atlassian.net/browse/OC-1087

@IsakTjernberg IsakTjernberg requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2024 13:58
@IsakTjernberg IsakTjernberg requested review from jungleraptor and a team as code owners March 21, 2024 13:00
Copy link
Contributor

@reimerix reimerix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(*count.borrow(), 1);
}

#[allow(dead_code)]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pcrumley What do you think of this change I had to make in order to have CI pass? See https://snav.slack.com/archives/C05HP6S1D2Q/p1711097571216779 for more context

Copy link
Contributor

@pcrumley pcrumley Mar 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @IsakTjernberg I was on PTO and just getting back into the swing of things. I think it makes more sense to fix the lints like this #1408 because #[allow(dead_code)] is kind of broad lint.

rust/sbp/src/link.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
remove change to allow dead code because no longer required
Copy link
Contributor

@pcrumley pcrumley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We ended up taking a different fix to get around this clippy lint issue

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed for 'libsbp-c'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@IsakTjernberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

We ended up taking a different fix to get around this clippy lint issue

Thanks @pcrumley!

@IsakTjernberg IsakTjernberg merged commit 957af03 into master Mar 28, 2024
31 checks passed
@IsakTjernberg IsakTjernberg deleted the isak/oc-1087 branch March 28, 2024 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants