Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fleshed out the comparison notebook and caught a few bugs #5

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023

Conversation

swagnercarena
Copy link
Owner

…ere 1) input_config had too small a sampling value for position of the subhalos, so most subhalos being sampled were far outside the Einstein radius and 2) Dex scatter was set to 0.0, but a non-zero dex scatter occasionally produces higher concentration halos which increase signal. No meaningful bugs in the actual jaxstronomy code, but I did change the way brightness normalization is done (now the images coming out of image_simulation are normalzied to the supersampling resolution pixel_scale and the downsampling code sums instead of doing a mean.

Sebastian Wagner-Carena added 2 commits March 3, 2023 01:21
…ere 1) input_config had too small a sampling value for position of the subhalos, so most subhalos being sampled were far outside the Einstein radius and 2) Dex scatter was set to 0.0, but a non-zero dex scatter occasionally produces higher concentration halos which increase signal. No meaningful bugs in the actual jaxstronomy code, but I did change the way brightness normalization is done (now the images coming out of image_simulation are normalzied to the supersampling resolution pixel_scale and the downsampling code sums instead of doing a mean.
@swagnercarena swagnercarena merged commit c372f48 into main Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant