-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Fido2 vs u2f #468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
msaldivar
wants to merge
19
commits into
supertokens:master
Choose a base branch
from
msaldivar:fido2_vs_u2f
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Fido2 vs u2f #468
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7e4cd85
add new blog dir
msaldivar 234393c
remove bad char
msaldivar d2b49f4
initial draft
msaldivar 3dffcd5
wip: add introduction
msaldivar 243e161
wip: add scope of use
msaldivar 20954b1
wip: add device compatibility
msaldivar ea3f893
wip: browser and platform support
msaldivar 6e080c3
wip: passwordless capability
msaldivar f6f7e2b
wip: which should you use today
msaldivar 98fc2c3
wip: how supertokens fits into fido2 adoption
msaldivar 33880dd
wip: conclusion
msaldivar 6df122b
wip: add header info
msaldivar fe0d387
wip: draft v1
msaldivar 46e3c32
add metadata info
msaldivar 7ca8a8c
Merge branch 'master' into fido2_vs_u2f
msaldivar aa9924a
fix merge issues from master
msaldivar 7c3b8c5
updates based on feedback
msaldivar ffbdd0a
Merge branch 'master' into fido2_vs_u2f
msaldivar 72ae23b
fix conflicts
msaldivar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| title: FIDO2 vs U2F 5 Key Differences Explained | ||
| description: "Understand the differences between FIDO2 and U2F. Learn how each works, where they apply, and which authentication standard to choose." | ||
| date: "2025-12-10" | ||
| cover: "FIDO2_VS_U2F" | ||
| category: "passwordless, u2f, best practices" | ||
| author: "Maurice Saldivar" | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Authentication standards evolve to address real security gaps. Passwords can be stolen. OTPs can be intercepted. U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) arrived in 2014 to solve this problem using public-key cryptography and physical security keys. Users authenticate with a password plus a hardware token that attackers cannot replicate remotely. FIDO2 expanded this model in 2018 by introducing WebAuthn and CTAP2, enabling both multi-factor and fully passwordless authentication through security keys, fingerprint sensors, or facial recognition. | ||
|
|
||
| Both standards bind credentials to specific origins, which blocks phishing, credential stuffing, and man-in-the-middle attacks. A fake login page at a different domain simply cannot request valid credentials. U2F established the foundation. FIDO2 builds on it with broader capabilities, but their long-term viability and supported use cases differ significantly. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 1. Scope of Use | ||
|
|
||
| **U2F**: operates exclusively as a second factor. Users must first authenticate with a password before U2F verification occurs. The security key proves possession of a registered device but cannot replace the initial authentication step. | ||
|
|
||
| **FIDO2**: supports both multi-factor and passwordless authentication. In multi-factor mode, it functions similarly to U2F. In passwordless mode, the security key becomes the sole authentication method. Users verify their identity through biometrics or a PIN on the authenticator itself, eliminating passwords entirely. | ||
|
|
||
| **Why This Matters**: | ||
|
|
||
| This architectural difference affects deployment strategy. Organizations using U2F must maintain password infrastructure: reset flows, complexity requirements, and rotation policies. With FIDO2 passwordless authentication, these concerns disappear. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 2. Underlying Standards | ||
|
|
||
| **U2F**: operates as a single specification published by the FIDO Alliance. The standard defines the complete authentication flow: browser communication, cryptographic operations, and data formats. This unified approach simplified initial adoption but limited flexibility. | ||
|
|
||
| **FIDO2**: splits functionality across two complementary standards. WebAuthn provides the browser API that web applications use to request authentication. CTAP2 (Client to Authenticator Protocol 2) defines how clients communicate with authenticators, whether external security keys or platform authenticators like Windows Hello or Touch ID. | ||
|
|
||
| **Why This Matters**: | ||
|
|
||
| This separation creates clear responsibility boundaries. WebAuthn standardizes what developers implement, regardless of which authenticator users choose. CTAP2 handles device communication, allowing authenticator manufacturers to innovate without breaking web applications. CTAP2 includes CTAP1, which provides U2F functionality, enabling backward compatibility during migration. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 3. Device Compatibility | ||
|
|
||
| **U2F**: authenticates exclusively through external hardware tokens. Users must purchase and carry physical security keys like YubiKey or Titan Security Key. The protocol has no mechanism for using biometrics or built-in device capabilities. | ||
|
|
||
| **FIDO2**: authenticates through both external keys and platform authenticators. Platform authenticators leverage hardware already present in devices: fingerprint sensors on laptops, facial recognition on smartphones, or TPM chips in computers. Windows Hello, Touch ID, Face ID, and Android biometric authentication all function as FIDO2 authenticators. | ||
|
|
||
| **Why This Matters**: | ||
|
|
||
| This flexibility changes deployment economics. Organizations can implement FIDO2 without purchasing additional hardware for users with compatible devices. A laptop with a fingerprint reader or a phone with Face ID becomes the authenticator. Platform authenticators improve user experience for single-device scenarios, but external keys provide portability across devices. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 4. Browser & Platform Support | ||
|
|
||
| **U2F**: reached peak browser support around 2017 before browsers began deprecating it. Chrome deprecated the U2F API in Chrome 98 (2022) and removed it entirely in Chrome 115 (2023). Firefox deprecated U2F in favor of WebAuthn starting in version 60. Safari never implemented U2F natively. | ||
|
|
||
| **FIDO2**: through WebAuthn has universal modern browser support. Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge all implement the WebAuthn standard with full functionality. Mobile browsers on iOS and Android support FIDO2, enabling authentication on smartphones and tablets. | ||
|
|
||
| **Why This Matters**: | ||
|
|
||
| Platform support extends to operating systems. Windows 10 and later include Windows Hello. macOS and iOS support Touch ID and Face ID through WebAuthn. Android devices use fingerprint sensors and facial recognition as platform authenticators. For new implementations, FIDO2 is the only viable choice. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 5. Passwordless Capability | ||
|
|
||
| **U2F**: cannot enable passwordless authentication. The protocol requires an initial password authentication before the second factor verification. This design limitation means U2F deployments must maintain complete password infrastructure, including reset mechanisms and complexity policies. | ||
|
|
||
| **FIDO2**: enables passwordless authentication through resident credentials (also called discoverable credentials or passkeys). The authenticator stores credential information locally, allowing users to authenticate without entering a username. The authentication flow becomes: connect authenticator, verify identity through biometrics or PIN, gain access. | ||
|
|
||
| **Why This Matters**: | ||
|
|
||
| Resident credentials work across devices when using external security keys. A YubiKey registered for passwordless authentication functions on any computer or mobile device that supports FIDO2. Platform authenticators create device-specific credentials: Touch ID credentials on a MacBook work only on that MacBook. | ||
|
|
||
| The passwordless capability eliminates entire categories of password-related attacks: phishing, credential stuffing, password spraying, and database breaches. Organizations deploying FIDO2 passwordless authentication remove passwords from the attack surface for those users. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Comparison Table | ||
|
|
||
| | Feature | U2F | FIDO2 | | ||
| |---------|-----|-------| | ||
| | Use Case | 2FA only | 2FA + Passwordless | | ||
| | Standards | U2F API | WebAuthn + CTAP | | ||
| | Devices | Hardware keys | Hardware + platform authenticators | | ||
| | Browser Support | Deprecated (removed from modern browsers) | Universal (Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge) | | ||
| | Passwordless Support | ❌ | ✅ | | ||
|
|
||
| ## Which Should You Use Today? | ||
|
|
||
| **U2F**: is a legacy standard. Chrome removed U2F API support in 2023, and other browsers either deprecated or never implemented it. Applications still using U2F APIs will break as browsers complete the removal process. | ||
|
|
||
| **FIDO2**: is the modern replacement, already powering passkeys and supported by tech giants (Apple, Google, Microsoft). New implementations should go directly to FIDO2 for future-proof authentication. Most security keys supporting U2F also support FIDO2, making hardware migration straightforward. | ||
|
|
||
| **Why This Matters**: | ||
|
|
||
| Organizations with existing U2F deployments should plan migration before browser support ends completely. The migration requires rewriting authentication code to use WebAuthn APIs, but this work becomes necessary regardless as browsers remove U2F support. | ||
|
|
||
| ## How SuperTokens Fits Into FIDO2 Adoption | ||
|
|
||
| ### Passwordless Support | ||
|
|
||
| SuperTokens implements FIDO2 through the WebAuthn recipe, handling protocol complexity while exposing clean APIs for developers: | ||
|
|
||
| ```javascript | ||
| import SuperTokens from "supertokens-node"; | ||
| import WebAuthn from "supertokens-node/recipe/webauthn"; | ||
| import Session from "supertokens-node/recipe/session"; | ||
|
|
||
| SuperTokens.init({ | ||
| appInfo: { | ||
| appName: "Your App", | ||
| apiDomain: "https://api.example.com", | ||
| websiteDomain: "https://example.com" | ||
| }, | ||
| recipeList: [ | ||
| WebAuthn.init(), | ||
| Session.init() | ||
| ] | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| The implementation supports both platform authenticators and external security keys. Users can register multiple authenticators per account, providing backup options and cross-device flexibility. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Session Security Beyond FIDO2 | ||
|
|
||
| FIDO2 authenticates users, but session management requires additional security measures. SuperTokens provides automatic token refresh, CSRF protection, and token theft detection. These session security features work regardless of authentication method, whether users authenticate via FIDO2, passwords, or social login. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Hybrid Auth Flows | ||
|
|
||
| Organizations rarely deploy a single authentication method. SuperTokens supports mixing methods: employees use FIDO2 with enterprise SSO, customers prefer social login or email OTP. The recipe system allows adding authentication methods without rewriting existing code: | ||
|
|
||
| ```javascript | ||
| SuperTokens.init({ | ||
| recipeList: [ | ||
| EmailPassword.init(), | ||
| ThirdParty.init({ | ||
| signInAndUpFeature: { | ||
| providers: [ThirdParty.Google.init()] | ||
| } | ||
| }), | ||
| WebAuthn.init(), | ||
| Session.init() | ||
| ] | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Future-Proof | ||
|
|
||
| Starting with basic authentication and expanding capabilities as requirements evolve avoids over-engineering. Add email authentication initially, then introduce FIDO2 when users request stronger security. As passkey adoption increases, enable the feature by activating the WebAuthn recipe without modifying existing accounts or session management. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Conclusion | ||
|
|
||
| U2F established phishing-resistant authentication as a viable security control. FIDO2 extends these security properties while addressing U2F's limitations: passwordless support, platform authenticators, and universal browser compatibility. | ||
|
|
||
| The five key differences affect implementation decisions: | ||
|
|
||
| * **Scope**: FIDO2's dual support for multi-factor and passwordless authentication provides deployment flexibility | ||
| * **Standards**: WebAuthn and CTAP2 separation creates clear boundaries between web APIs and device communication | ||
| * **Devices**: Platform authenticator support eliminates hardware procurement for many users | ||
| * **Browser Support**: Universal implementation versus deprecated status | ||
| * **Passwordless**: Resident credentials enable password elimination | ||
|
|
||
| For new implementations, use FIDO2. The standard has industry backing through the passkeys initiative, comprehensive browser support, and active ecosystem development. Existing U2F deployments should plan migration before browser support ends completely. | ||
|
|
||
| SuperTokens simplifies FIDO2 adoption by handling protocol complexity and providing session security beyond authentication. The recipe system supports gradual capability expansion, allowing organizations to start with basic authentication and add FIDO2 when requirements justify it. | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -480,6 +480,9 @@ | |
| "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/cors-errors" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| <<<<<<< HEAD | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. please resolve this merge conflict correctly |
||
| "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/fido2_vs_u2f" | ||
| ======= | ||
| "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/webauthn-explained" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
|
|
@@ -493,8 +496,12 @@ | |
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/authentication-protocols" | ||
| <<<<<<< HEAD | ||
| >>>>>>> master | ||
| ======= | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/gemini-phishing-attack" | ||
| >>>>>>> master | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a "Why this matters" subheading here