Added Cargo.lock and removed from .gitignore#83
Merged
Conversation
As stated in the .gitignore, Cargo.lock should be included in repositories for executables, i.e. removed from .gitignore. Please see https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/guide/cargo-toml-vs-cargo-lock.html for more information.
13 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As stated in the .gitignore, Cargo.lock should be included in repositories for executables, i.e. removed from .gitignore. Please see https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/guide/cargo-toml-vs-cargo-lock.html for more information.
Pull request is motivated by the need to create a nix package in nixpkgs for a project. To compile correctly a Cargo.lock file is needed. For now I've listed my fork with this change as the source for the package but I can change it to this upstream as soon as the Cargo.lock file is included. I also recommend bumping the minor version when merging this for differentiability.
Also see #377405 on nixpkgs.