Skip to content

corpus: harvest realized-outcome verifier cases - #3026

Merged
stranske merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
verifier-corpus-harvest/auto
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

corpus: harvest realized-outcome verifier cases#3026
stranske merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
verifier-corpus-harvest/auto

Conversation

@stranske

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Automated corpus growth (#2819 move 2).

High-confidence cases derived from realized PR outcomes — see the run
summary for the promoted case list. Ambiguous cases were routed to the
auto-expiring staging file, not here.

Expected verdicts here come from what the world already adjudicated by
merging or reverting each PR. The semantic NON_PASS categories
(stale-verifier-claim, review-thread-debt, missing-acceptance-criterion)
remain owner-sourced and are never machine-added.

@stranske stranske added the automation Automation and workflow automation label Aug 10, 2026
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 10, 2026 06:04
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@stranske
stranske enabled auto-merge (squash) August 10, 2026 06:04
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 22 minutes

Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 122444f4-fcfd-4da4-b863-1f408a3d2dc0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 676798f and 743a607.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • config/model_eval_corpus_staging.json

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@agents-workflows-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Workflow source needed

PR #3026 needs either a linked GitHub issue or one valid non-issue Workflow Source before PR metadata automation can manage it safely.

Please do one of:

  • Add <!-- meta:issue:123 --> or a normal Closes #123 / Related to #123 line.
  • Check one Workflow Source option in the PR body.
  • Add a hidden marker such as <!-- workflow-source:local_request -->, <!-- workflow-source:manual_remote -->, <!-- workflow-source:review_followup -->, <!-- workflow-source:sync_campaign -->, or <!-- workflow-source:dependabot -->.
  • Add a workflow source label such as workflow:source-direct-pr, workflow:source-local-request, workflow:source-review-followup, workflow:source-sync, or workflow:no-automation.

Once a valid source is present, this warning will not be reposted.

@stranske-keepalive

stranske-keepalive Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated Status Summary

Head SHA: 987e4cc
Latest Runs: ⏳ pending — Gate
Required contexts: summary
Required: core tests (3.12): ⏳ pending, core tests (3.13): ⏳ pending, docker smoke: ⏳ pending, gate: ⏳ pending

Workflow / Job Result Logs
(no jobs reported) ⏳ pending

Coverage Overview

  • Coverage history entries: 0

Updated automatically; will refresh on subsequent CI/Docker completions.


Keepalive checklist

Scope

No scope information available

Tasks

  • No tasks defined

Acceptance criteria

  • No acceptance criteria defined

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the verifier evaluation corpus inputs by appending newly harvested realized-outcome cases to the staging corpus file, supporting the ongoing automated corpus growth pipeline described in #2819 move 2.

Changes:

  • Added two new harvested clean-pass cases (workflows-2757, pension-data-711) to the staging corpus with harvested_at: 2026-08-10.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment on lines +141 to +147
"case_id": "workflows-2757",
"repo": "stranske/Workflows",
"pr": 2757,
"expected_verdict": "PASS",
"category": "clean-pass",
"provenance": "harvested",
"harvested_at": "2026-08-10"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automation Automation and workflow automation model-selection

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants