Agent belt for #2758 - #2759
Conversation
|
Agent worker (codex) activated for branch @codex start Implement only this task in your first commit. |
🤖 Keepalive Loop StatusPR #2759 | Agent: Codex | Iteration 0/12 Current State
🔍 Failure Classification| Error type | infrastructure |
|
Keepalive Work Log (click to expand)
|
|
Runner dispatch state for codex on PR #2759. Do not edit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ca7f239177
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
5a26b15 to
80367fc
Compare
|
Opener cap-drain audit (2026-07-13): routing is now mechanically correct (agent:codex, agents:keepalive, autofix, agent:retry; non-draft registry branch). Fresh Gate and CodeRabbit are successful, and review evidence is clear. The latest keepalive state remains 0/47 tasks after 13 agent-run-failed attempts with no actionable branch-local failure, so this is not merge-ready. Next required decision: authorize the protected runner change and specify the sensitive-redaction/evidence-identity field boundary; then keepalive/closer should resume the implementation sequence. Opener removed only stale completion labels and did not dispatch another retry to avoid repeating the exhausted runner loop. |
|
Runner dispatch state for claude on PR #2759. Do not edit. |
|
Opener drain audit (2026-07-14): do not merge based on green checks alone. Current PR diff is only |
|
Closer evidence audit (2026-07-24): #2759 remains non-mergeable as an implementation PR. Its diff contains only |
|
Owner authorization is now granted. This PR remains conflicting and its diff contains only |
|
Closed as a conflicting, metadata-only non-implementation PR. Source #2758 remains open and is being re-dispatched for authorized substantive implementation. |
Closes #2758
Automated Status Summary
Scope
PR #2755 addressed issue #2752, but verification identified concerns (verdict: CONCERNS). This follow-up addresses the remaining gaps with improved task structure, with emphasis on orchestrator-side evidence handling, idempotent processing, invalid-evidence rejection, and end-to-end verification.
Context for Agent
Related Issues/PRs
Tasks
Acceptance criteria
Given a runner completion payload containing structured evidence fields for an existing candidate capability ID, the orchestrator completion-event adapter attaches the evidence to that existing candidate capability and does not create any new capability record.
Given a runner completion payload containing structured evidence fields for an existing shadow capability ID, the orchestrator completion-event adapter attaches the evidence to that existing shadow capability and does not promote the shadow capability to active solely because the evidence payload was processed.
When a completion payload contains only raw prompt text or generic runner prose and no valid structured evidence object, the orchestrator rejects the payload for capability evidence processing and performs no capability creation, activation, dispatch, or promotion.
When the same accepted evidence payload is submitted twice with the same stable evidence identity key, the first submission records exactly one evidence association and the second submission produces no additional capability-state mutation and no additional ledger entry for that evidence.
The orchestrator derives the same evidence identity key for semantically identical replayed evidence payloads that differ only in transport-level envelope fields not used for evidence identity.
If accepted evidence includes one or more counterexamples, the orchestrator persists those counterexamples on the linked candidate/shadow capability and includes them in the serialized ledger/event record for that evidence-processing operation.
If accepted evidence does not include counterexamples, the orchestrator must not remove or overwrite any pre-existing counterexamples already stored on the target candidate/shadow capability.
Evidence ingestion rejects a payload with a spoofed or nonexistent capability ID before any capability association logic runs, emits a distinct invalid-evidence diagnostic code for spoofed_capability_id, and leaves capability state and ledger contents unchanged.
Evidence ingestion rejects a payload with an unstable fingerprint, emits a distinct invalid-evidence diagnostic code for unstable_fingerprint, and performs no capability-state or ledger mutation.
Evidence ingestion rejects a payload containing an oversized ref value beyond the configured schema limit, emits a distinct invalid-evidence diagnostic code for oversized_ref, and performs no capability-state or ledger mutation.
Evidence ingestion rejects a payload missing required provenance fields, emits a distinct invalid-evidence diagnostic code for missing_provenance, and performs no capability-state or ledger mutation.
Malformed evidence that fails orchestrator schema validation is rejected before any activation, dispatch, promotion, or capability-linking function is invoked.
Runner output schemas and normalization logic accept payloads where all newly introduced evidence fields are absent, and those payloads continue to validate under the legacy-compatible path without requiring default values for the new fields.
A payload produced by reusable-codex-run.yml includes the same optional evidence output field names and output wiring as the other standardized runner workflows.
Sensitive evidence fields configured for redaction are masked in orchestrator logs and GitHub Actions summaries, and the raw unredacted values do not appear in emitted log lines or summary output.
(2 further criteria elided; split this issue)
Summary by CodeRabbit