Skip to content

chore: sync workflow templates - #5674

Merged
stranske merged 1 commit into
phase-3from
sync/workflows-2dc5f6ceac12
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

chore: sync workflow templates#5674
stranske merged 1 commit into
phase-3from
sync/workflows-2dc5f6ceac12

Conversation

@stranske

@stranske stranske commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Sync Summary

Files Updated

  • maint-76-claude-code-review.yml: Claude Code review (opt-in) - runs only on labeled PRs or manual dispatch

Files Skipped

  • pr-00-gate.yml: File exists and sync_mode is create_only
  • ci.yml: File exists and sync_mode is create_only
  • renovate.json: File exists and sync_mode is create_only
  • cross-repo-smoke.yml: File exists and sync_mode is create_only
  • AGENTS.md: Repo keeps historical Agents.md casing to avoid case-only path conflicts
  • llm_slots.json: None

Review Checklist

  • CI passes with updated workflows
  • No repo-specific customizations were overwritten

Source: stranske/Workflows
Source SHA: f329dbdf3612922fab25b8d002b802c5f3ef7186
Template hash: 2dc5f6ceac12
Sync branch: sync/workflows-2dc5f6ceac12
Consumer repo: stranske/Trend_Model_Project
Manifest: .github/sync-manifest.yml

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal code review workflow tooling to use the latest version.

Automated sync from stranske/Workflows
Template hash: 2dc5f6ceac12

Changes synced from sync-manifest.yml
@stranske stranske added sync Automated sync from Workflows automated Automated sync from Workflows labels Jun 23, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 637371a5-3bdf-40fd-bca7-af8b383ff5e2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d95fe6 and f870b9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml
🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

  • stranske/Workflows (auto-detected)
  • stranske/Template (auto-detected)
📜 Recent review details
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
{pyproject.toml,.github/workflows/**/*.{yml,yaml}}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

Check both pyproject.toml ([tool.coverage.report] fail_under) AND workflow files for coverage-min settings - these must match or the lower one wins

Files:

  • .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml
.github/workflows/**/*.{yml,yaml}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

For startup_failure GitHub Actions workflow errors with zero jobs, check for common causes: Invalid YAML syntax, top-level permissions: block on workflow_call reusable workflows (conflicts with caller permissions), invalid permission scopes, or circular workflow references

Files:

  • .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml
.github/workflows/*.yml

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Reference reusable workflows in .github/workflows/*.yml files with @main unless intentionally pinning to an exact commit SHA for a controlled reason

Files:

  • .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml (1)

192-192: LGTM!


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The uses: reference for anthropics/claude-code-action in the "Run Claude Code Review" step of .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml is updated to a new pinned commit SHA. No other step inputs, configuration, or workflow logic is changed.

Changes

Workflow Action SHA Bump

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update anthropics/claude-code-action pinned SHA
.github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml
The uses: line for the Run Claude Code Review step is changed to a new pinned commit SHA for anthropics/claude-code-action; all surrounding step inputs and configuration remain identical.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • stranske/Trend_Model_Project#5556: Changes the same anthropics/claude-code-action pinned commit SHA in the same workflow file and step with no other configuration altered.
  • stranske/Trend_Model_Project#5589: Updates the same uses: commit SHA for the Run Claude Code Review step in the same workflow file, leaving all other step configuration unchanged.
  • stranske/Trend_Model_Project#5595: Changes the same pinned anthropics/claude-code-action commit hash in the same workflow file and step with no other workflow logic altered.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: sync workflow templates' directly relates to the main change—syncing workflow templates from an external repository into the project.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch sync/workflows-2dc5f6ceac12

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@stranske
stranske merged commit e930c1c into phase-3 Jun 24, 2026
69 of 77 checks passed
@stranske
stranske deleted the sync/workflows-2dc5f6ceac12 branch June 24, 2026 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automated Automated sync from Workflows sync Automated sync from Workflows

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant