chore: sync workflow templates

[stranske]

Sync Summary

Files Updated

• maint-76-claude-code-review.yml: Claude Code review (opt-in) - runs only on labeled PRs or manual dispatch

Files Skipped

• .github/workflows/pr-00-gate.yml: Maintains a fully custom Gate workflow; never overwrite (replaces the hard-coded custom_gate_repos list in maint-68).
• ci.yml: File exists and sync_mode is create_only
• renovate.json: File exists and sync_mode is create_only
• cross-repo-smoke.yml: File exists and sync_mode is create_only
• llm_slots.json: None

---

Review Checklist

• CI passes with updated workflows
• No repo-specific customizations were overwritten

Source: stranske/Workflows
Source SHA: 8ee41928ebaeffa75539e5e3ee0b6fa11b313398
Template hash: 2c33f158db7e
Sync branch: sync/workflows-2c33f158db7e
Consumer repo: stranske/Manager-Database
Manifest: .github/sync-manifest.yml

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the pinned version of an automated code review workflow action to a newer commit reference.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4f948418-7c95-46ec-9a94-d83d966b37e5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between afafc56 and abbb456.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml

🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

• stranske/Workflows (auto-detected)
• stranske/Template (auto-detected)

📜 Recent review details

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (3)

**/.github/workflows/**/!(*.md)

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

For workflow_call reusable workflows, do not use top-level permissions: block as it conflicts with caller permissions (documented in docs/INTEGRATION_GUIDE.md)

Files:

• .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml

**/.github/workflows/*.{yml,yaml}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

For startup_failure in workflows with zero jobs, check for invalid YAML syntax, invalid permission scopes, top-level permissions block on workflow_call, or circular workflow references

Files:

• .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml

.github/workflows/*.yml

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

.github/workflows/*.yml: In this consumer repository, keep most workflow logic in stranske/Workflows and only carry repo-specific configuration unless explicitly documented as an exception
First-party consumers should reference reusable workflows with @main unless intentionally pinning to an exact commit SHA for a controlled reason

Reference reusable workflows with @main in first-party consumers unless intentionally pinning to an exact commit SHA for a controlled reason

Files:

• .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml

🔀 Multi-repo context stranske/Template, stranske/Workflows

[::stranske/Template::] .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml:192 repins anthropics/claude-code-action from 74eedf1a1892082d619c3edb66b9402da6520e7f to 428971d2ecd6e3a7cb0ee0da2a3a8b33fdb3678d.

[::stranske/Workflows::] templates/consumer-repo/.github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml still shows the same workflow step pinned to anthropics/claude-code-action@428971d2ecd6e3a7cb0ee0da2a3a8b33fdb3678d, so the template source and consumer repo are aligned on the new SHA.

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml (1)

192-192: LGTM!

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Claude Code Review workflow updates the pinned commit SHA for anthropics/claude-code-action in its review step. No other workflow behavior changes are included.

Changes

Claude review workflow

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Pinned action SHA update .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml	The “Run Claude Code Review” step now points to a different pinned anthropics/claude-code-action commit SHA.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• stranske/Manager-Database#1249: Updates the same workflow step in .github/workflows/maint-76-claude-code-review.yml by repinning anthropics/claude-code-action.
• stranske/Manager-Database#1242: Also changes the pinned SHA for anthropics/claude-code-action in the Claude review workflow step.
• stranske/Manager-Database#1217: Modifies the same workflow action pin in the Claude Code Review job.

Suggested labels

dependencies

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the workflow template sync reflected by the workflow SHA update.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch sync/workflows-2c33f158db7e

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}