-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
Controls: fix option label display when name matches Array built-in method #33908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
mixelburg
wants to merge
4
commits into
storybookjs:next
from
mixelburg:fix/reverse-control-option-label
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Story doesn't reproduce the actual bug condition
The bug is triggered only when
labelsis inadvertently an array —labels?.['reverse']then resolves toArray.prototype.reverse(a truthy function). Whenlabelsis omitted (as it is here), both old and new code take the identicalString(item)path, so this story would have passed even before the fix.To make it a true regression guard, pass
labelsas an empty array (casting past TypeScript since the buggy scenario is a runtime type mismatch):🧪 Suggested improvement to cover the bug path
export const ArrayWithBuiltinNames: Story = { name: 'Array with option names matching built-in Array methods', args: { value: optionsWithArrayMethodNames[0], argType: { options: optionsWithArrayMethodNames }, + // Simulates the bug: labels accidentally being an Array object causes + // labels?.['reverse'] to return Array.prototype.reverse (a function). + // The fix guards against this by checking typeof label === 'string'. + // eslint-disable-next-line `@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any` + labels: [] as any, }, };Alternatively, consider adding a unit test that directly calls
normalizeOptions(['normal', 'reverse', 'filter', 'map'], [] as any)and asserts the keys equal the plain strings.📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents