Skip to content

Conversation

@vojtechtrefny
Copy link
Member

LVM DBus uses assert to check for empty IDs so it produces error which isn't easy to decipher.

LVM DBus uses assert to check for empty IDs so it produces error
which isn't easy to decipher.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @vojtechtrefny, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the LVM DBus interface by making error reporting more explicit and user-friendly. It addresses a scenario where providing an invalid or empty LVM ID would previously result in an obscure assertion failure. The change introduces a direct check for such invalid IDs, ensuring that callers receive a clear and actionable error message, thereby improving the robustness and debuggability of applications interacting with the LVM DBus service.

Highlights

  • Error Handling: Improved error handling in the get_lvm_object_properties function by explicitly checking for NULL or empty LVM IDs. Instead of relying on an assert that would lead to a cryptic error, a specific BD_LVM_ERROR_NOEXIST is now returned with a clear message: "Invalid LVM ID specified".
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to provide a better error message for invalid LVM IDs by adding a check for NULL or empty obj_id in get_lvm_object_properties. The change is a good step, but I've identified a critical issue and an opportunity for refactoring. The current implementation in get_lvm_object_properties has a bug that can lead to a crash and also duplicates code from another function, get_object_path. My review includes a suggestion to refactor the function to fix the bug and improve code quality. I also noted that get_object_path has the same vulnerability and should be fixed for a complete solution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants