Skip to content

Unexpected output of permittedFieldsOf with direct and indirect rules containing field patterns #955

Answered by stalniy
ftwang asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi

thanks for the issue. The actual logic under permittedFieldsOf doesn’t support wildcards in fields

so you found a bug

Replies: 2 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by ftwang
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@stalniy
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants