-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
PEAR/PSR2/FunctionCallSignature: support anonymous classes #3636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PEAR/PSR2/FunctionCallSignature: support anonymous classes #3636
Conversation
|
Note: this does cause some overlap with the |
.. to document that the sniff also handles comparisons passed in the instantiation of an anonymous class.
The function call spacing for anonymous class instantiations was so far not checked by these or any other PHPCS native sniffs.
In my opinion, object instantiations of anonymous classes should be treated the same an object instantiations of non-anonymous classes.
The `PEAR.Functions.FunctionCallSignature` and the `PSR2.Methods.FunctionCallSignature` sniffs check the object instantiation spacing for non-anonymous classes, so seem like the logical place to also check the spacing for anonymous class object instantiations.
To add this support, the `T_ANON_CLASS` token has been added to the `Tokens::$functionNameTokens` array.
Notes:
* As PSR12 does not specify the spacing between the `class` keyword and the open parenthesis (or rather is unclear about it), I am explicitly excluding anonymous classes from the "space before open parenthesis" check.
Related: squizlabs/PHP_CodeSniffer 3200
* I have verified all other uses of the `Tokens::$functionNameTokens` array within PHPCS.
- The `Generic.WhiteSpace.ArbitraryParenthesesSpacing` sniff is not affected by the change and already contains a test to verify this.
- The `Squiz.Operators.ComparisonOperatorUsage` sniff also is not affected by the change. I have added tests to confirm this in a separate commit.
* Obviously external standards using the token array _may_ be affected by the change, but a scan of the most popular external standards showed me that the token array is rarely used and when it is used, is mostly used incorrectly.
The only sniff using the array, which looks to be using it correctly and which may be affected, is the `WebImpressCodingStandard.WhiteSpace.ScopeIndent` sniff. Whether this is positive or negative is up to michalbundyra to determine.
Includes unit tests for both the `PEAR.Functions.FunctionCallSignature` and the `PSR2.Methods.FunctionCallSignature` sniffs .
90dd786 to
62d473d
Compare
|
Rebased without any real changes to solve the merge conflicts. |
DannyvdSluijs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The tests in this PR function as a proof the added functionality works as expected including the undefined number of spaces between the class keyword and opening parenthesis.
|
Closing as replaced by PHPCSStandards/PHP_CodeSniffer#47 |
The function call spacing for anonymous class instantiations was so far not checked by these
or any other PHPCS nativesniffs.In my opinion, object instantiations of anonymous classes should be treated the same an object instantiations of non-anonymous classes.
The
PEAR.Functions.FunctionCallSignatureand thePSR2.Methods.FunctionCallSignaturesniffs check the object instantiation spacing for non-anonymous classes, so seem like the logical place to also check the spacing for anonymous class object instantiations.To add this support, the
T_ANON_CLASStoken has been added to theTokens::$functionNameTokensarray.Notes:
classkeyword and the open parenthesis (or rather is unclear about it), I am explicitly excluding anonymous classes from the "space before open parenthesis" check.Related: Unexpected spacing for anonymous classes with constructor arguments #3200
Tokens::$functionNameTokensarray within PHPCS.Generic.WhiteSpace.ArbitraryParenthesesSpacingsniff is not affected by the change and already contains a test to verify this.Squiz.Operators.ComparisonOperatorUsagesniff also is not affected by the change. I have added tests to confirm this in a separate commit.The only sniff using the array, which looks to be using it correctly and which may be affected, is the
WebImpressCodingStandard.WhiteSpace.ScopeIndentsniff. Whether this is positive or negative is up to @michalbundyra to determine.Includes unit tests for both the
PEAR.Functions.FunctionCallSignatureand thePSR2.Methods.FunctionCallSignaturesniffs .