-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Finish reorganization of the Spyder repo #3277
Conversation
Better to get this merge soon, no? |
I prefer to leave this PR to be the last one because it's easier for me to handle updating it. |
- This was happening when restarting the application in Python 2
And @stonebig ;-) |
It's fine for me. I'll have to update every plugin once again. |
Yeah, sorry about it :-) Last major refactor before 3.0 final, promised!! El 04/07/16 a las 06:17, Joseph Martinot-Lagarde escribió:
|
I don't rely anymore on "\spyderlib" (at least, I believe it), so you can proceed. the sooner the better for me. |
- This follows recent discussions about the same topic on the Jupyter project.
Ok, this one is going in. Hopefully it won't cause too much disruption for the rest of our PRs :-) Letting all @spyder-ide/core-developers know about it. |
Fixes #1320
spyderlib
tospyder
(one of the main reasons of bumping our version to 3.0). Sorry for doing it so late, but there were many other things to do before this ;-)Pinging @Nodd about it :-)