Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 and PySide6 > 6.3 and QFileDialog static methods kwarg compatibility #449

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 24, 2023

Conversation

dalthviz
Copy link
Member

@dalthviz dalthviz commented Aug 22, 2023

Need for changes discovered at napari/napari#6164 (comment) and napari/napari#6164 (comment)

@dalthviz dalthviz added this to the v2.4.0 milestone Aug 22, 2023
@dalthviz dalthviz self-assigned this Aug 22, 2023
@dalthviz dalthviz changed the title PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 [WIP] PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 Aug 22, 2023
@dalthviz dalthviz changed the title [WIP] PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 [WIP] PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 and PySide6 > 6.3 Aug 22, 2023
@dalthviz dalthviz changed the title [WIP] PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 and PySide6 > 6.3 [WIP] PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 and PySide6 > 6.3 and QFileDialog static methods kwarg compatibility Aug 23, 2023
@dalthviz dalthviz marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2023 15:54
@dalthviz dalthviz changed the title [WIP] PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 and PySide6 > 6.3 and QFileDialog static methods kwarg compatibility PR: Improve enum to flags aliasing for PyQt6 and PySide6 > 6.3 and QFileDialog static methods kwarg compatibility Aug 23, 2023
Copy link
Member

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your work @dalthviz! It looks good to me, but I have one quick question:

Has this been tested in Napari and works as expected now? I say it because it seems your previous PR was not enough for what they need.

@dalthviz
Copy link
Member Author

Has this been tested in Napari and works as expected now? I say it because it seems your previous PR was not enough for what they need.

Yep, checks were done and seems like the latest changes here fixed the issues. You can see the feedback for the last changes at napari/napari#6164 (comment)

Copy link
Member

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @dalthviz!

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 merged commit 6ae5759 into spyder-ide:master Aug 24, 2023
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants