Skip to content

EntityManagerFactoryUtils.findEntityManagerFactory() does not search parent contexts if persistence unit name is unspecified [SPR-10160] #14793

@spring-projects-issues

Description

@spring-projects-issues

Tim Yates opened SPR-10160 and commented

Bottom line:

When EntityManagerFactoryUtils.findEntityManagerFactory() is called with a persistence unit name, it looks for an EntityManagerFactory bean through the whole context hierarchy. If the persistence unit name is omitted, it will only look at the current context and ignore beans in any parent context.

Why this matters:

I have a Spring MVC application that has a global context in /WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml and an MVC context in /WEB-INF/dispatcher-servlet.xml. The EntityManagerFactory is configured in the global context, and we have an OpenEntityManagerInViewInterceptor in the MVC context. If I leave the OEMIVInterceptor's persistenceUnitName property undefined, the application fails to start up with this error:

org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No unique bean of type [javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory] is defined: expected single bean but found 0
    at org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanFactoryUtils.beanOfType(BeanFactoryUtils.java:394)
    at org.springframework.orm.jpa.EntityManagerFactoryUtils.findEntityManagerFactory(EntityManagerFactoryUtils.java:111)
    at org.springframework.orm.jpa.EntityManagerFactoryAccessor.setBeanFactory(EntityManagerFactoryAccessor.java:139)
    at ...

However, if I specify the persistenceUnitName, all is well. This also worked previously when all the beans were defined in one context (without the need to specify the persistence unit).

If this is not a bug, I fail to see the logic behind it. Here is the relevant snippet from EntityManagerFactoryUtils.findEntityManagerFactory():

if (StringUtils.hasLength(unitName)) {
    // See whether we can find an EntityManagerFactory with matching persistence unit name.
    String[] candidateNames =
        BeanFactoryUtils.beanNamesForTypeIncludingAncestors(beanFactory, EntityManagerFactory.class);
    // ...
}
else {
    return BeanFactoryUtils.beanOfType(beanFactory, EntityManagerFactory.class);
}

As you can see, it calls the "...IncludingAncestors" method if the persistence unit name is defined, but uses the no-hierarchy version otherwise. This could easily be fixed by changing the second call to:

else {
    return BeanFactoryUtils.beanOfTypeIncludingAncestors(beanFactory, EntityManagerFactory.class);
}

Affects: 3.1.3, 3.2 GA

Referenced from: commits 1a929f2, 50ed863

Backported to: 3.1.4

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

in: dataIssues in data modules (jdbc, orm, oxm, tx)status: backportedAn issue that has been backported to maintenance branchestype: enhancementA general enhancement

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions