Consolidate support for HandlerInterceptor and MappedInterceptor types in AbstractHandlerMapping [SPR-8352]

[spring-projects-issues]

Rossen Stoyanchev opened SPR-8352 and commented

MappedInterceptors are dealt with in AbstractUrlHandlerMapping as opposed to in its base class AbstractHandlerMapping because MappedInterceptors require access to a UrlPathHelper and a PathMatcher. This worked initially but the newly introduced AbstractHandlerMethodMapping extends directly from AbstractUrlHandlerMapping and there may be other such implementations (e.g. FlowUrlHandlerMapping).

The goal of this ticket is to consolidate handling of HandlerInterceptors and MappedInterceptors, provide a single setter for configuring both, and apply them to requests in a way that is re-usable across sub-classes of AbstractHandlerMapping.

---

Affects: 3.1 M1

Issue Links:

• Mapped interceptors are not applied to current handler [SPR-7946] #12601 Mapped interceptors are not applied to current handler