-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41.6k
21873 flaky tests #21988
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
21873 flaky tests #21988
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ | |
| import org.springframework.web.socket.handler.TextWebSocketHandler; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; | ||
| import static org.awaitility.Awaitility.await; | ||
| import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.empty; | ||
| import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.is; | ||
| import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.not; | ||
|
|
@@ -88,19 +89,16 @@ void servesLivereloadJs() throws Exception { | |
| void triggerReload() throws Exception { | ||
| LiveReloadWebSocketHandler handler = connect(); | ||
| this.server.triggerReload(); | ||
| Thread.sleep(200); | ||
| this.server.stop(); | ||
| assertThat(handler.getMessages().get(0)).contains("http://livereload.com/protocols/official-7"); | ||
| assertThat(handler.getMessages().get(1)).contains("command\":\"reload\""); | ||
| await().atMost(Duration.ofSeconds(1)).until(handler::getMessages, | ||
| (msgs) -> msgs.get(0).contains("http://livereload.com/protocols/official-7") | ||
| && msgs.get(1).contains("command\":\"reload\"")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| void pingPong() throws Exception { | ||
| LiveReloadWebSocketHandler handler = connect(); | ||
| handler.sendMessage(new PingMessage()); | ||
| Thread.sleep(200); | ||
| assertThat(handler.getPongCount()).isEqualTo(1); | ||
| this.server.stop(); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we need to keep this call to
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The same situation as above. |
||
| await().atMost(Duration.ofSeconds(1)).until(handler::getPongCount, is(1)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
|
|
@@ -119,8 +117,7 @@ private void awaitClosedException() throws InterruptedException { | |
| void serverClose() throws Exception { | ||
| LiveReloadWebSocketHandler handler = connect(); | ||
| this.server.stop(); | ||
| Thread.sleep(200); | ||
| assertThat(handler.getCloseStatus().getCode()).isEqualTo(1006); | ||
| await().atMost(Duration.ofSeconds(1)).until(() -> handler.getCloseStatus().getCode(), is(1006)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private LiveReloadWebSocketHandler connect() throws Exception { | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to keep this call to
stop().There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test class already has an
@AfterEachwhich callsthis.server.stop();.I assumed the original author had written those 2 test cases first and only after that decided to have a general
@AfterEachmethod (and maybe forgot to take the individualstop()s out).I made sure that the tests run fine without them.
Do you think
stop()should be kept nevertheless?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I'd missed that when reviewing the diffs in isolation. I agree there's no need to keep the
stop()calls. To keep this change clean, I think it makes sense to remove thestop()calls separately. No need for you to do anything though. We can take care of it prior to merging this.