Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing setter for strict field in DelimitedBuilder #809

Closed
spring-projects-issues opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Missing setter for strict field in DelimitedBuilder #809

spring-projects-issues opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator

tobecat opened BATCH-2798 and commented

In static class DelimitedBuilder  (FlatFileItemReaderBuilder Class), there is no method to set strict to DelimitedLineTokenizer. It is always true.

Please Add method for set strict flag.
public DelimitedBuilder  <T> strict(boolean strict) {
this.strict = strict;
return this;
}


No further details from BATCH-2798

cppwfs added a commit to cppwfs/spring-batch that referenced this issue May 12, 2021
cppwfs added a commit to cppwfs/spring-batch that referenced this issue May 12, 2021
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine removed the status: waiting-for-triage Issues that we did not analyse yet label Sep 14, 2023
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine changed the title Add strict(boolean strict) method in DelimitedBuilder [BATCH-2798] Missing setter for strict field in DelimitedBuilder Sep 14, 2023
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added type: bug for: backport-to-5.0.x Issues that will be back-ported to the 5.0.x line and removed type: enhancement labels Sep 14, 2023
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added this to the 5.1.0-M3 milestone Sep 14, 2023
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine removed the for: backport-to-5.0.x Issues that will be back-ported to the 5.0.x line label Sep 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants