Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

conditional ingress for wiremock pods #1445

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 17, 2023

Conversation

wind57
Copy link
Contributor

@wind57 wind57 commented Sep 16, 2023

No description provided.

@@ -438,6 +439,33 @@ public void wiremock(String namespace, String path, Phase phase) {

}

public void wiremock(String namespace, String path, Phase phase, boolean withIngress) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wind57 wind57 Sep 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the idea is that we have a lot of integration tests that deploy wiremock pods, but not every test needs to have an ingress attached to it. This takes time, though we don't really need it.

@wind57 wind57 changed the title k8s client moved conditional ingress for wiremock pods Sep 16, 2023
@wind57 wind57 marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2023 05:29
@wind57
Copy link
Contributor Author

wind57 commented Sep 17, 2023

@ryanjbaxter simple PR that shaves off some time when running integration tests

@@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ private void waitForConfigMap(String namespace, ConfigMap configMap, Phase phase
});
}

@Deprecated(forRemoval = true)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not have this method call the new method?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah! good point

@ryanjbaxter ryanjbaxter added this to the 3.0.5 milestone Sep 17, 2023
@ryanjbaxter ryanjbaxter merged commit 866bcfa into spring-cloud:3.0.x Sep 17, 2023
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants