Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mongodb_instance: remove mongodb_type, update recipes #45

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

josephholsten
Copy link
Contributor

pretty much what it says on the tin.

I added the mongodb_type to add a bit of sanity long ago when I was trying to convert mongodb_instance to a resource the first (or hundredth?) time. After updating my resourcification branch, I see it's not needed.

@josephholsten
Copy link
Contributor Author

oh, the reason this is required for #44 is that current calls to mongodb_instance use the mongodb_type, enablerest and smallfiles params, which will not be included in the LWRP

@josephholsten
Copy link
Contributor Author

here's the easy to read version: https://github.com/chef-brigade/mongodb-cookbook/pull/45/files?w=1

@luishdez, @rex how's this look?

@damacus
Copy link
Member

damacus commented Dec 21, 2016

I think we need some test to make sure this doesn't blow anything up before merging this in any further.

@josephholsten if you're happy I'm going to close his off now.

@shortdudey123
Copy link
Contributor

shortdudey123 commented Apr 17, 2017

Closing
will be tracked in #148 after the v1 rewrite

@shortdudey123 shortdudey123 deleted the clean-up-instance-calls branch April 17, 2017 06:17
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jul 24, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants