Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Break Backward Compatibility #78

Closed
josephholsten opened this issue Jul 17, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Break Backward Compatibility #78

josephholsten opened this issue Jul 17, 2015 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@josephholsten
Copy link
Contributor

From edelight/chef-mongodb#308

Note: this ticket may be out of date.

Someday soon we're going to have to break backwards compatibility, and we may as well rip the bandage off. This is a tracking ticket for all the backwards incompatible changes that should go into the next breaking release (1.0?).

  • allow arbitrary shard names
  • separate shard and replicaset names
  • remove references to 10gen
  • support compound sharding keys
  • stop creating a mongodb_instance in mongodb::default
  • update default paths to match mongodb defaults
  • use yaml format config, incompatible with < 2.6 mongo
@rex rex added this to the 3.0 Support [Multi-Version] milestone Jul 29, 2015
@damacus damacus added 1.0.0 and removed 3.0 labels Dec 17, 2016
@damacus damacus modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 3.0 Support [Multi-Version], 1.1.0 Dec 17, 2016
@shortdudey123 shortdudey123 modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 1.1.0 Apr 12, 2017
@shortdudey123
Copy link
Contributor

Moved from 1.1.0 to 1.0.0 since i cover most of this already in the rewrite

@shortdudey123
Copy link
Contributor

Completed in v1 rewrite

  • remove references to 10gen
  • update default paths to match mongodb defaults
  • use yaml format config, incompatible with < 2.6 mongo

Todo

  • stop creating a mongodb_instance in mongodb::default
  • support compound sharding keys
  • allow arbitrary shard names
  • separate shard and replicaset names

@shortdudey123
Copy link
Contributor

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jul 24, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants