Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

separate shard and replicaset names #143

Open
shortdudey123 opened this issue Apr 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

separate shard and replicaset names #143

shortdudey123 opened this issue Apr 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@shortdudey123
Copy link
Contributor

shortdudey123 commented Apr 12, 2017

Copied from edelight/chef-mongodb#95

If choosing between two recipes that accomplish the same thing, but one is simpler and the other is more complicated... which is better? I am thinking about the idea that the variable shard_name may be extraneous, and that it complicates usage of this recipe by adding yet another variable which you have to think about and understand. When setting up a shard manually (without chef), do you usually assign shard_name? A shard is either a replica set, or it's a single machine. What makes sense is to name the replica set with a replicaset_name. And just that. Only that. Perhaps I am missing something though.

tl; dr is shard_name really needed?

@shortdudey123 shortdudey123 added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Apr 12, 2017
@shortdudey123 shortdudey123 modified the milestones: 2.0.0, 1.0.0 May 20, 2017
@github-actions
Copy link

Marking stale due to inactivity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days. Alternatively drop by the #sous-chefs channel on the Chef Community Slack and we'll be happy to help! Thanks, Sous-Chefs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 30, 2020
@xorimabot xorimabot removed the Stale label Sep 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants