-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 549
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid segment fault in ASIC/SDK health event handling when vendor SAI passes an invalid timestamp #3446
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
The coverage report is inaccurate. The mock test covers all lines. see below back trace
|
@stephenxs , able to fix coverage? |
if (difftime(t, now) > year_in_seconds) | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ERROR("Invalid timestamp second %" PRIx64 " in received ASIC/SDK health event, reset to current time", timestamp.tv_sec); | ||
t = now; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think this could be make as static helper function to correct_time etc, and it would be easier to test something like this
608b1f2
to
4bab3b2
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@prsunny I think this is an issue in the coverage tool itself. |
4bab3b2
to
81fdf54
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azpw run |
/AzurePipelines run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azpw run |
/AzurePipelines run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
81fdf54
to
66748fc
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
66748fc
to
6d2daff
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
6d2daff
to
6c57a06
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
6c57a06
to
4a17681
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
4a17681
to
17656bb
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
… passes an invalid timestamp Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <[email protected]>
17656bb
to
fb75699
Compare
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@prsunny would you help merge it? All test passed. Thanks. |
What I did
Prevent orchagent from being segment fault when it receives a timestamp indicating a time in the far future (2^31 years later) in the ASIC/SDK health event from the vendor SAI.
It's vendor SAI's failure to pass such a large timestamp but we need to protect such invalid input.
Why I did it
How I verified it
Mock test
Details if related
In case vendor SAI passed a very large timestamp, put_time can cause segment fault which can not be caught by try/catch infra
We check the difference between the timestamp from SAI and the current time and force to use current time if the gap is too large
By doing so, we can avoid the segment fault