Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[submodule][master] Update submodule sonic-swss to the latest HEAD automatically #20610

Merged

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

@mssonicbld mssonicbld commented Oct 25, 2024

Why I did it

src/sonic-swss

* 93f7c150 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Fix State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE removal not happening. (#3347) (10 hours ago) [abdosi]
* d76c34e4 - fix error in rif_rates.lua (#3218) (31 hours ago) [InspurSDN]
* a3aaa398 - Add suppport for SAI DASH appliance object (#3284) (32 hours ago) [Mukesh Moopath Velayudhan]
* 064f2e3d - Fix the tlm_teamd deleting STATE_DB LAG_TABLE entry. (6 days ago) [abdosi]

How I did it

How to verify it

Description for the changelog

@saiarcot895
Copy link
Contributor

@abdosi Can you take a look here? Suspecting that your change is breaking the pc/test_po_update.py test module.

@mssonicbld mssonicbld force-pushed the submodule-master-sonic-swss branch from 4d75dc6 to e422e13 Compare October 30, 2024 03:03
prsunny pushed a commit to sonic-net/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
What I did:
Original issue and and PR: #3333

Why I did:
Fix the failure in test_po_update.py as seen in this PR checker: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#20610
Previous fix blocked State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE deletion which is not correct as this table is created by tlm_teamd (owner).
Intention was to prevent deletion of State Db LAG_TABLE owner of which is teamsyncd.
mssonicbld pushed a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
What I did:
Original issue and and PR: sonic-net#3333

Why I did:
Fix the failure in test_po_update.py as seen in this PR checker: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#20610
Previous fix blocked State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE deletion which is not correct as this table is created by tlm_teamd (owner).
Intention was to prevent deletion of State Db LAG_TABLE owner of which is teamsyncd.
@yejianquan
Copy link
Contributor

@abdosi Can you take a look here? Suspecting that your change is breaking the pc/test_po_update.py test module.

@saiarcot895 FYI, should be fixed by sonic-net/sonic-swss#3347

mssonicbld pushed a commit to sonic-net/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
What I did:
Original issue and and PR: #3333

Why I did:
Fix the failure in test_po_update.py as seen in this PR checker: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#20610
Previous fix blocked State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE deletion which is not correct as this table is created by tlm_teamd (owner).
Intention was to prevent deletion of State Db LAG_TABLE owner of which is teamsyncd.
@mssonicbld mssonicbld force-pushed the submodule-master-sonic-swss branch from e422e13 to 111705a Compare October 31, 2024 02:05
@mssonicbld mssonicbld force-pushed the submodule-master-sonic-swss branch from 111705a to 180a33c Compare October 31, 2024 03:03
@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 25f2f3a into sonic-net:master Nov 1, 2024
20 checks passed
stepanblyschak pushed a commit to stepanblyschak/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
What I did:
Original issue and and PR: sonic-net#3333

Why I did:
Fix the failure in test_po_update.py as seen in this PR checker: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#20610
Previous fix blocked State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE deletion which is not correct as this table is created by tlm_teamd (owner).
Intention was to prevent deletion of State Db LAG_TABLE owner of which is teamsyncd.
rkavitha-hcl pushed a commit to rkavitha-hcl/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
…lly (sonic-net#20610)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-swss
```
* 93f7c150 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Fix State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE removal not happening. (sonic-net#3347) (10 hours ago) [abdosi]
* d76c34e4 - fix error in rif_rates.lua (sonic-net#3218) (31 hours ago) [InspurSDN]
* a3aaa398 - Add suppport for SAI DASH appliance object (sonic-net#3284) (32 hours ago) [Mukesh Moopath Velayudhan]
* 064f2e3d - Fix the tlm_teamd deleting STATE_DB LAG_TABLE entry. (6 days ago) [abdosi]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
aidan-gallagher pushed a commit to aidan-gallagher/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2024
…lly (sonic-net#20610)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-swss
```
* 93f7c150 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Fix State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE removal not happening. (sonic-net#3347) (10 hours ago) [abdosi]
* d76c34e4 - fix error in rif_rates.lua (sonic-net#3218) (31 hours ago) [InspurSDN]
* a3aaa398 - Add suppport for SAI DASH appliance object (sonic-net#3284) (32 hours ago) [Mukesh Moopath Velayudhan]
* 064f2e3d - Fix the tlm_teamd deleting STATE_DB LAG_TABLE entry. (6 days ago) [abdosi]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
divyachandralekha pushed a commit to divyachandralekha/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
What I did:
Original issue and and PR: sonic-net#3333

Why I did:
Fix the failure in test_po_update.py as seen in this PR checker: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#20610
Previous fix blocked State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE deletion which is not correct as this table is created by tlm_teamd (owner).
Intention was to prevent deletion of State Db LAG_TABLE owner of which is teamsyncd.
divyachandralekha pushed a commit to divyachandralekha/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
What I did:
Original issue and and PR: sonic-net#3333

Why I did:
Fix the failure in test_po_update.py as seen in this PR checker: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#20610
Previous fix blocked State Db LAG_MEMBER_TABLE deletion which is not correct as this table is created by tlm_teamd (owner).
Intention was to prevent deletion of State Db LAG_TABLE owner of which is teamsyncd.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants