Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Tree view is a little noisy - Application name is duplicated #227

Closed
madpah opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #228
Closed

[FEATURE] Tree view is a little noisy - Application name is duplicated #227

madpah opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #228
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released

Comments

@madpah
Copy link
Collaborator

madpah commented Jan 14, 2022

Since the tree view was implemented when Workspace support was added, the Application name is present as part of the Tree and repeated for each dependency. This is duplication and can push some of the important information right out of immediate view.

Screenshot 2022-01-14 at 15 13 25

cc @bhamail / @DarthHater

@madpah madpah added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 14, 2022
@madpah madpah linked a pull request Jan 14, 2022 that will close this issue
madpah added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2022
* fix: change so that `gradlew` has priority over `gradle`

* fix: remove duplication of application name in tree view - resolves #227

* chore: bump sonatype/react-shared-components to latest
brent-spiner pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2022
## [1.2.3](v1.2.2...v1.2.3) (2022-01-17)

### Bug Fixes

* change so that `gradlew` has priority over `gradle` ([#228](#228)) ([8f6fea2](8f6fea2)), closes [#227](#227)
@brent-spiner
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.2.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants