feat(kanban): route implementation handoffs through review - #5
feat(kanban): route implementation handoffs through review#5solovision24 wants to merge 0 commit into
Conversation
💡 Codex Reviewhermes-agent/hermes_cli/kanban_db.py Lines 4379 to 4380 in a408b32 When a reviewed task has dependent children, marking the canonical implementation task hermes-agent/tools/kanban_tools.py Lines 807 to 811 in a408b32 In a dispatcher-spawned worker, an explicit foreign AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L1116-L1122 hermes-agent/tools/kanban_tools.py Lines 801 to 811 in a408b32 The model-controlled review ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
Closed as superseded by PR #11. This PR targets stale fork main and has drifted into an unrelated-history conflict (8,097 changed files / 10,000 commits), so resolving the conflict would be unsafe and incorrect. The canonical native Review implementation is PR #11 on dev/hermes-upgrade-t_16bbffad. Do not reopen or merge this branch. |
…review #5) The fence-cancel poll loops (sync host wait in conversation_compression, async hygiene wait in gateway/run) spun at 1kHz while the worker held the fence through its lock-setup window — which rides SessionDB write patience and can last seconds. 25ms keeps sub-tick cancel latency without the spin.
Summary
Verification
Router note