Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 13, 2022. It is now read-only.

Include Editor and Contributors #17

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Mitzi-Laszlo
Copy link

At the W3C Solid Community Group call on the 11th April it was decided to include the spec editor and contributors to each of the Solid specification repositories. The editor is clearly the Solid Specifications Repository Manager.

Please join to the conversation on what you think should be the criteria to be included as a contributor on solid/solid-spec#155

This is a good place to put your name if you would like to be included as a contributor to this repository.

At the W3C Solid Community Group call on the 11th April it was decided to include the spec editor and contributors to each of the Solid specification repositories. The editor is clearly the Solid Specifications Repository Manager. 

Please join to the conversation on what you think should be the criteria to be included as a contributor on solid/solid-spec#155

This is a good place to put your name if you would like to be included as a contributor to this repository.
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

I think @dmitrizagidulin should get listed as one of the authors and possibly also as previous editor.
https://github.com/solid/webid-oidc-spec/graphs/contributors

@michielbdejong

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@RubenVerborgh RubenVerborgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite the name, this is not a spec, it is documentation.
Let us reserve the editor/author process for when we write the actual spec, in the solid/specifications repo.

Apart from that, this PR does not add names.

@TallTed
Copy link

TallTed commented Jun 14, 2019

@RubenVerborgh - As you say, the repo name is confusing. Perhaps it might be worth renaming this and any others that foster similar confusion?

Copy link
Member

@kjetilk kjetilk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tend to agree with @RubenVerborgh on this.

Perhaps "Contributors" is sufficient, or is it chiefly authored by just a small group of people who should (also) be listed as "Authors"?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants