Skip to content

Conversation

@dev-jodee
Copy link
Contributor

@dev-jodee dev-jodee commented Oct 29, 2025

  • Modified TransactionUtil::new_unsigned_versioned_transaction_resolved to return a Result type, ensuring proper error handling.
  • Updated various test cases and transaction validation logic to unwrap results, improving robustness and clarity in error management.
  • Introduced a new utility function get_account_key_required in IxUtils for safer account key retrieval, enhancing error reporting for missing keys.

Important

Improves error handling in transaction processing by returning Result in TransactionUtil::new_unsigned_versioned_transaction_resolved and adding IxUtils::get_account_key_required for safer account key retrieval.

  • Behavior:
    • TransactionUtil::new_unsigned_versioned_transaction_resolved now returns Result, improving error handling.
    • Updated test cases in fee.rs, transfer_transaction.rs, and transaction_validator.rs to unwrap results, enhancing error management.
  • Utilities:
    • Added IxUtils::get_account_key_required for safer account key retrieval, improving error reporting for missing keys.
  • Functions:
    • Modified IxUtils::uncompile_instructions to return Result, ensuring robust error handling.

This description was created by Ellipsis for a610995. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

📊 Unit Test Coverage

Coverage

Unit Test Coverage: 80.8%

View Detailed Coverage Report

- Modified `TransactionUtil::new_unsigned_versioned_transaction_resolved` to return a `Result` type, ensuring proper error handling.
- Updated various test cases and transaction validation logic to unwrap results, improving robustness and clarity in error management.
- Introduced a new utility function `get_account_key_required` in `IxUtils` for safer account key retrieval, enhancing error reporting for missing keys.
@dev-jodee dev-jodee requested a review from amilz October 29, 2025 19:24
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to a610995 in 1 minute and 5 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 1000 lines of code in 6 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 4 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. crates/lib/src/validator/transaction_validator.rs:364
  • Draft comment:
    Consider caching the config value in validate_strict_pricing_with_fee instead of calling get_config() again. This could improve performance by avoiding redundant config fetches.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. crates/lib/src/validator/transaction_validator.rs:311
  • Draft comment:
    The inner loop in validate_disallowed_accounts iterates over each account in every instruction. Consider using a hash set for disallowed accounts to improve lookup performance if the number of accounts is large.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. crates/lib/src/validator/transaction_validator.rs:149
  • Draft comment:
    In validate_programs, consider providing additional context in the error message (e.g. which instruction or its index) to aid debugging when a program is not allowed.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. crates/lib/src/validator/transaction_validator.rs:170
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure that the macros used (validate_system! and validate_spl!) handle all edge cases. A code review of these macro definitions (if not already covered) is recommended to avoid unexpected behavior.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_h3kMO3alCZHfjNrS

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@dev-jodee dev-jodee merged commit 26ff2e1 into release/feature-freeze-for-audit Oct 29, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants