Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added supplier details to license view #14494

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

snipe
Copy link
Owner

@snipe snipe commented Mar 26, 2024

This adds the supplier's details on the license view page.

@snipe snipe merged commit 1f29eb1 into develop Mar 26, 2024
8 checks passed
Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Mar 26, 2024

PR Summary

  • Added Verification for License Supplier
    The update includes an added condition that verifies if a license sourced has an associated supplier, enhancing the accuracy of our license reports.

  • Included Supplier Information in Detailed Display
    This modification has made it possible to present comprehensive supplier information in our system. This means when you view a license, you'll also be privy to supplier details like the name, URL, phone, email, address, city, state, country, and zip.

  • Improvement in Supplier Data Representation
    There have been changes to add rows and columns specifically for the purpose of displaying detailed supplier information. Included are also supplier related icons and quick access links for more efficient user interaction.

  • Handling Unavailable Suppliers
    A new feature has been added that displays a "deleted" status in case a particular supplier's information is not accessible or has been removed. This will provide a clearer data status understanding and reduce confusion regarding missing supplier information.

@snipe snipe deleted the features/add_supplier_address_to_licenses branch March 26, 2024 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant