[Feature Request]: Encrypted fields visibility for Non-Admins

[r-xyz]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Currently encrypted fields are only viewable and editable by users with admin role.

Nonetheless, granting admin role will also grant all other permissions.

Describe the solution you'd like

A better granularity would be desirable, so managers could for example add new assets (filling also encrypted fields) but cannot edit Users.

A possible solution would be to add additional permissions for encrypted fields, similar to "Custom fields"

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

[welcome]

👋 Thanks for opening your first issue here! If you're reporting a 🐞 bug, please make sure you include steps to reproduce it. We get a lot of issues on this repo, so please be patient and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

[snipe]

Ability to view and edit encrypted custom fields is set on the asset permission.

[r-xyz]

Thanks @snipe for the quick reply. You are right, I should have double checked. Then I am afraid it is a bug report.

Users with those permissions enabled can view the encrypted fields and copy them, but they cannot edit them.

When editing an asset, the value is showed in the corresponding field. Though if they modify and save, no error is shown, but the field is not updated.

Asset view detail:

Asset view edit detail:

[r-xyz]

Steps to reproduce

1. Create a non-admin user and give it all asset permissions
2. Create an asset with at least one encrypted field
3. Login as the user. Verify the encrypted field is viewable.
4. Edit the asset encrypted fields. Save. Verify it succeed.
5. Reopen the edit view. Verify the value has not changed.

[r-xyz]

Shall I close and reopen as bug report?

[swift2512]

Can confirm on pulled newest master. If user isn't set as admin, his edits of encrypted fields doesn't save. In debug mode could find errors or warnings.

[r-xyz]

Thanks again! :) Looking forward for next release!