smithy-lang · mtdowling · Jul 25, 2023 · Jul 14, 2023
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+# Defining Smithy Timestamps
+
+* **Author**: Michael Dowling
+* **Created**: 2023-07-14
+
+# Abstract
+
+This document defines the missing details of Smithy timestamp shapes that will
+help ensure consistent implementations across programming languages, including
+the temporal resolution and range of allowable dates.
+
+## Motivation
+
+The timestamp shape is a protocol agnostic instant in time; its data type in
+code does not change based on the protocol bindings or serialized format of the
+timestamp. Smithy's timestamp shape does not currently define critical details
+that implementations need to consistently implement Smithy across programming
+languages, including the temporal resolution of a timestamp or the supported
+date range. This lack of specification risks incompatibilities across
+implementations.
+
+## Proposal
+
+A timestamp represents an instant in time in the proleptic Gregorian calendar,
+independent of local times or timezones. Timestamps support an allowable date
+range between midnight January 1, 0001 CE to 23:59:59.999 on
+December 31, 9999 CE, with a temporal resolution of 1 millisecond. This
+resolution and range ensures broad support across programming languages and
+guarantees compatibility with [RFC 3339](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339.html).
+
+### Rationale
+
+Determining the temporal resolution and allowable range of a Smithy timestamp is
+difficult because we want to ensure broad compatibility across programming
+languages. Smithy protocols today support an undefined fractional precision for
+many timestamp formats, which in practice when calling AWS APIs is millisecond
+precision. This implies that Smithy timestamps should at least support
+millisecond precision, but it does not imply a minimum and maximum date. To
+determine an appropriate range, we observe the following programming language
+date/time types:
+
+* .NET
+  - [DateTime](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.datetime?view=net-7.0):
+    Nanosecond precision (every 100 nanosecond "ticks"), with a range of
+    January 1, 0001 through December 31, 9999.
+* C++: [chrono time_point](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/time_point):
+  Seems to allow any resolution, calendar, or date range.
+* Go: [Time](https://pkg.go.dev/time#Time): Nanosecond precision, using a
+  signed int to represent years.
+* Java:
+    * [Instant](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/time/Instant.html):
+      Nanosecond precision, ranging from -1000000000-01-01 to 1000000000-12-31.
+    * [Date](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/Date.html):
+      Millisecond precision with a range defined by a Long, allowing for dates
+      in the distant past and future.
+* JavaScript: [Date](https://262.ecma-international.org/5.1/#sec-15.9.1.1):
+  Millisecond precision. Can store ±8,640,000,000,000,000 milliseconds, which is
+  based on and slightly less than the maximum integral number that can be safely
+  represented by a JavaScript number. This provides a range from April 20,
+  271821 BCE to September 13, 275760 CE.
+* Kotlin: Java's Instant or [kotlinx.Instant](https://kotlinlang.org/api/kotlinx-datetime/kotlinx-datetime/kotlinx.datetime/-instant/):
+  Nanosecond precision, with an undocumented range.
+* PHP: [DateTime](https://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.datetime.php):
+  Microsecond precision, "The range is from about 292 billion years in the past
+  to the same in the future".
+* Python: [datetime](https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html):
+  Microsecond precision, ranging from 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z to 9999-12-31T23:59:
+  59.999999Z.
+* Ruby: [DateTime](https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.6.1/libdoc/date/rdoc/DateTime.html):
+  Nanosecond precision, with an undocumented range.
+* Swift: [Date](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/date)
+  / [NSDate](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsdate):
+  "sub-millisecond" precision, with the underlying representation using a Double
+  to contain sections and fractions of a second.
+
+Millisecond precision is the most broadly supported. Setting the default
+precision of timestamps to nanoseconds rather than milliseconds would
+immediately render the AWS SDK for PHP, JavaScript, Botocore, and many Amazon
+services incompatible with the requirement. Languages without nanosecond
+support would need to create custom data structures to represent timestamps
+that are incompatible with the rest of their ecosystem.
+
+Python and .NET's date ranges are the most limited. However, this range likely
+captures most of the use cases developers would expect from Smithy timestamps
+(i.e., typically representing nearby instants in time), and also ensures
+timestamp values are compatible with
+[RFC 3339 dates](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt).
+
+### Protocol limitations
+
+While Smithy timestamps can store timestamps with millisecond precision, not all
+protocols support serializing timestamps with this precision. For example,
+the `http-date` timestamp format does not support anything beyond second
+precision, which can result in a loss of precision when transmitting a
+timestamp. Modelers should be aware of the limitations of timestamp formats when
+defining Smithy models.
+
+This proposal will update the specification of Smithy's
+existing [timestamp formats](https://smithy.io/2.0/spec/protocol-traits.html#timestampformat-trait)
+to document the representable precision and behavior when a timestamp is too
+granular.
+
+* `http-date`: Second precision with no fractional seconds. A deserializer that
+  encounters an `http-date` timestamp with fractional precision SHOULD fail to
+  deserialize the value (for example, an HTTP server SHOULD return a 400 status
+  code).
+* `date-time`: Millisecond precision. Values that are more granular than
+  millisecond precision SHOULD be truncated to fit millisecond precision.
+* `epoch-seconds`: Millisecond precision. Values that are more granular than 
+  millisecond precision SHOULD be truncated to fit millisecond precision.
+
+#### Protocol limitations rationale
+
+Because the resolution of a Smithy timestamp was previously undefined,
+truncating timestamps that are too granular rather than failing to deserialize
+them ensures that existing and new implementations can interoperate. Truncating
+overly precise times also keeps the door open in case support for nanosecond
+precision is needed in the future (e.g., using a hypothetical
+`@resolution("nanos")` trait).
+
+### Timestamp representation in code
+
+Implementations MUST NOT directly expose the serialized value of a timestamp.
+Timestamps are an abstraction to represent an instant in time, and the
+serialization format of a timestamp can vary depending on the protocol
+or `@timestampFormat` trait of the shape. Because Smithy is protocol agnostic,
+changing the serialization format of a shape MUST NOT have any impact on the
+representation of that shape in code.
+
+When generating code, implementations MUST use a type for Smithy timestamp
+shapes that can hold *at least* the minimum and maximum supported values using
+millisecond precision. Implementations MAY use a type that represents dates with
+a wider range or temporal resolution than Smithy's timestamp shape.
+Implementations SHOULD use an idiomatic date/time data structure for the
+target environment, though they may need to use an alternative data structure
+to represent Smithy timestamps if they do not have access to a date/time type
+with at least millisecond precision spanning the supported range.
+
+Some programming language types offer more granularity than millisecond
+precision (e.g., Java's `Instant`). Using such data types to represent a Smithy
+timestamp is fine as long as the timestamp is serialized according to any
+limitations defined in the protocol and any `@timestampFormat` trait applied to
+the timestamp. Implementations SHOULD NOT refuse to serialize a timestamp due to
+an overly granular value, and instead they should serialize the timestamp
+according to the limitations of the protocol and model.
+
+## Alternatives and tradeoffs
+
+### Use nanosecond resolution
+
+Standardizing on nanoseconds would make it more difficult for JavaScript (ms),
+PHP (us), Python (us), and to an extent .NET to losslessly represent timestamps.
+Smithy implementations for these programming languages would need to choose
+whether they should use a lossy but idiomatic data type when working with
+timestamps, or if they want to create their own data structure.
+
+Languages without nanosecond support could provide a light-weight data structure
+that easily converts to idiomatic date/time types. This kind of abstraction
+SHOULD NOT be created for languages that already provide compatible date/time
+types. A drawback of such a type is that a Smithy timestamp would be
+incompatible with the rest of the language's date/time types (e.g, intervals).
+Any date/time-based logic would have to be handled manually by end-users.
+
+Finally, nanosecond precision is not currently supported by most of AWS, which
+supports millisecond precision.
@@ -334,11 +334,12 @@ Simple shapes
     * - bigDecimal
       - Arbitrary precision signed decimal number
     * - timestamp
-      - Represents an instant in time with no UTC offset or timezone. The
-        serialization of a timestamp is an implementation detail that is
-        determined by a :ref:`protocol <protocolDefinition-trait>` and
-        MUST NOT have any effect on the types exposed by tooling to
-        represent a timestamp value.
+      - A timestamp represents an instant in time in the proleptic Gregorian
+        calendar, independent of local times or timezones. Timestamps support
+        an allowable date range between midnight January 1, 0001 CE to
+        23:59:59.999 on December 31, 9999 CE, with a temporal resolution of 1
+        millisecond. This resolution and range ensures broad support across
+        programming languages and guarantees compatibility with :rfc:`3339`.
     * - document
       - Represents protocol-agnostic open content that functions as a kind of
         "any" type. Document types are represented by a JSON-like data model

@@ -302,19 +302,24 @@ Smithy defines the following built-in timestamp formats:
       - Description
     * - date-time
       - Date time as defined by the ``date-time`` production in
-        `RFC3339 section 5.6 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339#section-5.6>`_
-        with optional fractional precision but no UTC offset (for example,
-        ``1985-04-12T23:20:50.52Z``).
-        *However*, offsets are parsed gracefully, but the datetime is normalized
-        to an offset of zero by converting to UTC.
+        :rfc:`3339#section-5.6` with optional millisecond precision but no
+        UTC offset (for example, ``1985-04-12T23:20:50.520Z``). Values that
+        are more granular than millisecond precision SHOULD be truncated to
+        fit millisecond precision. Deserializers SHOULD parse ``date-time``
+        values that contain offsets gracefully by normalizing them to UTC.
     * - http-date
       - An HTTP date as defined by the ``IMF-fixdate`` production in
         :rfc:`7231#section-7.1.1.1` (for example,
-        ``Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:30:38 GMT``).
+        ``Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:30:38 GMT``). A deserializer that encounters an
+        ``http-date`` timestamp with fractional precision SHOULD fail to
+        deserialize the value (for example, an HTTP server SHOULD return a 400
+        status code).
     * - epoch-seconds
       - Also known as Unix time, the number of seconds that have elapsed since
         00:00:00 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), Thursday, 1 January 1970,
-        with optional fractional precision (for example, ``1515531081.1234``).
+        with optional millisecond precision (for example, ``1515531081.123``).
+        Values that are more granular than millisecond precision SHOULD be
+        truncated to fit millisecond precision.
 
 .. rubric:: Resolving timestamp formats
 

@@ -218,19 +218,24 @@ Smithy defines the following built-in timestamp formats:
       - Description
     * - date-time
       - Date time as defined by the ``date-time`` production in
-        :rfc:`3339#section-5.6`
-        with optional fractional precision but no UTC offset (for example,
-        ``1985-04-12T23:20:50.52Z``).
-        *However*, offsets are parsed gracefully, but the datetime is normalized
-        to an offset of zero by converting to UTC.
+        :rfc:`3339#section-5.6` with optional millisecond precision but no
+        UTC offset (for example, ``1985-04-12T23:20:50.520Z``). Values that
+        are more granular than millisecond precision SHOULD be truncated to
+        fit millisecond precision. Deserializers SHOULD parse ``date-time``
+        values that contain offsets gracefully by normalizing them to UTC.
     * - http-date
       - An HTTP date as defined by the ``IMF-fixdate`` production in
         :rfc:`7231#section-7.1.1.1` (for example,
-        ``Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:30:38 GMT``).
+        ``Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:30:38 GMT``). A deserializer that encounters an
+        ``http-date`` timestamp with fractional precision SHOULD fail to
+        deserialize the value (for example, an HTTP server SHOULD return a 400
+        status code).
     * - epoch-seconds
       - Also known as Unix time, the number of seconds that have elapsed since
         00:00:00 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), Thursday, 1 January 1970,
-        with optional fractional precision (for example, ``1515531081.1234``).
+        with optional millisecond precision (for example, ``1515531081.123``).
+        Values that are more granular than millisecond precision SHOULD be
+        truncated to fit millisecond precision.
 
 .. rubric:: Resolving timestamp formats
 

@@ -144,17 +144,37 @@ A bigDecimal is an arbitrary precision signed decimal number.
 timestamp
 =========
 
-A timestamp represents an instant in time with no UTC offset or timezone.
-The serialization of a timestamp is an implementation detail that is
-determined by a :ref:`protocol <protocolDefinition-trait>` and MUST NOT
-have any effect on the types exposed by tooling to represent a timestamp
-value.
+A timestamp represents an instant in time in the proleptic Gregorian calendar,
+independent of local times or timezones. Timestamps support an allowable date
+range between midnight January 1, 0001 CE to 23:59:59.999 on
+December 31, 9999 CE, with a temporal resolution of 1 millisecond. This
+resolution and range ensures broad support across programming languages and
+guarantees compatibility with :rfc:`3339`.
 
 .. code-block:: smithy
 
     timestamp MyTimestamp
 
 
+Timestamp serialization and deserialization
+-------------------------------------------
+
+The serialization format of a timestamp is an implementation detail that is
+determined by a :ref:`protocol <protocolDefinition-trait>` and or
+:ref:`timestampFormat-trait`. The format of a timestamp MUST NOT have any
+effect on the types exposed by tooling to represent a timestamp value.
+
+Protocols and ``timestampFormat`` traits MAY support temporal resolutions
+other than 1 millisecond. For example, the ``http-date`` timestamp format
+supports only seconds and forbids fractional precision. Modelers need to be
+aware of these limitations when defining timestamps to avoid an unintended
+loss of precision.
+
+The use of timestamps outside the allowable range risk not interoperating
+correctly across Smithy implementations; deserializers that encounter
+timestamps outside the allowable range SHOULD fail to deserialize the value.
+
+
 .. _document:
 
 document