Skip to content

Conversation

@digama0
Copy link
Collaborator

@digama0 digama0 commented Aug 17, 2025

Partial implementation of #119 .

have ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _, _, vA', va', cM', vr', nh', eqt', eq'⟩ := nu.inv_idRec
have ⟨l, _, _, _, _, _, _, vA, va, cM, vr, nh, eqt, eq⟩ := nt.inv_idRec
have ⟨l', _, _, _, _, _, _, vA', va', cM', vr', nh', eqt', eq'⟩ := nu.inv_idRec
cases show l = l' by sorry
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Vtec234 Could you take a look at this? I think it should be possible to prove this from Meq and synthLevel.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can't call Meq without knowing the levels are equal. On first glance, it seems the equateX conclusions must all be generalized to return l = l'. There might be a way around that, not sure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants