Skip to content

Conversation

@Drejzer
Copy link
Member

@Drejzer Drejzer commented Sep 24, 2025

Copied the docs from the C++ library (in cases where return parameters were not documented, I left what was already in the wrapper docs.

+ Updated overlooked change in backendRequester
+ Switched to 2.6.0 version of the library

@Drejzer Drejzer self-assigned this Sep 24, 2025
@Drejzer Drejzer changed the base branch from main to 2.6.0-staging September 24, 2025 14:55
@Drejzer Drejzer requested review from filipg43 and zurekz September 25, 2025 13:49
@Drejzer Drejzer marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2025 13:49
/// - Parameter inboxId: ID of the Inbox to which the request applies
/// - Parameter data: entry data to send
/// - Parameter inboxFileHandles: optional list of file handles that will be sent with the request
/// - Parameter userPrivKey: sender can optionally provide a private key, which will be used: 1) to sign the sent data, 2) to derivation of the public key,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. to derive the public key

@Drejzer Drejzer merged commit d87cd56 into 2.6.0-staging Sep 30, 2025
@Drejzer Drejzer deleted the feat/changes_from_2.6.0 branch September 30, 2025 09:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants