-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[api] Add max 32 mb on content data #264
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Asra Ali <[email protected]>
@@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ | |||
"content": { | |||
"description": "Specifies the content inline within the document", | |||
"type": "string", | |||
"format": "byte" | |||
"format": "byte", | |||
"maxLength" : 32000000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we can't comment here in the JSON. I'll make a note in the nginx config to remember to update both places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, filed a TODO over there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this change would limit the length of the inline base64 encoded content field, it's not sufficient to develop an equivalent limit to what the NGINX ingress was enforcing (i.e. the entire number of bytes passed in the HTTP request body). Also since OpenAPI is enforcing this via the length of the string, the 32M value really puts a limit on the content of ~67% of that or approx 21MB.
I can see use cases for passing large files to Rekor (e.g. signed ISO images or jumbo containers), and since certain types can be fully streamed (rekord and RPM) while others can't (soon-to-be-added JAR support), I think we need to revert this PR and consider it more broadly. I'm happy to take some time to develop a proposal on this.
I could also imagine some users might want a size limit to be configurable, so that is something to consider as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could also imagine some users might want a size limit to be configurable, so that is something to consider as well.
Agree, this could be a config value in rekor-server.yaml, that way you can place 32000000
as the default value in the config, but users of rekor who have needs for larger file can still set accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds great, would love to chat more about office hours! I had exactly that problem with not being able to measure the request itself, and couldn't see a great solution here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue right now is that it's enforced at ingress, not in our rekor config. That's the main reason client-validation would be nice, otherwise we end up with random errors from the load balancer that clients can't catch.
It might be better to just let clients hit it though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could also return back the 413 w/ error message
Signed-off-by: Asra Ali [email protected]
Fixes #220
Adds a max of 32 MB to content data to avoid hitting ingress max size.
Not sure I particularly like this since the error is sorta opaque, but at the same time it's defined in the schema. Otherwise, I can add to
Validate
for each type and return a more verbose error message on expected/actual size.