Skip to content

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 18, 2025

🎉 This combination of pull requests has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

Branch release-v7.0.0 (8ce9edc) and [#7095 + #7145] are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of [#7095 + #7145].
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue default for merge:

  • check-success=local-testnet-success
  • check-success=test-suite-success

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 7095
  - number: 7145
...

eserilev and others added 26 commits March 10, 2025 15:29
* add an update_cache flag to get_state to have more granular control over when we write to the cache

* State cache tweaks

- add state-cache-headroom flag to control pruning
- prune old epoch boundary states ahead of mid-epoch states
- never prune head block's state
- avoid caching ancestor states unless they are on an epoch boundary

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <[email protected]>
(it got re-complicated in the merge commit)
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 18, 2025

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
4 out of 5 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ eserilev
✅ michaelsproul
✅ antondlr
✅ dapplion
❌ mergify[bot]
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@mergify mergify bot closed this Mar 18, 2025
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/f8d7b7c6d0 branch March 18, 2025 02:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants