Update AI provider configurations with new models - #250
Conversation
Add new AI models and update existing provider configurations to include deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1:free, moonshotai/kimi-k2:free, openai/gpt-oss-120b:free, and qwen/qwen3-coder:free models with proper provider settings
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughAdded four new ":free" model entries to the OpenRouter models configuration in home-manager/modules/opencode/opencode.jsonc, each with provider order set to baseten and allow_fallbacks set to false. Existing configurations remain unchanged. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant U as User
participant C as Client
participant OR as OpenRouter
participant BT as Baseten Provider
participant M as Selected Model (:free)
U->>C: Send request (select :free model)
C->>OR: API call with model and routing
Note over OR: provider_order = [baseten]<br/>allow_fallbacks = false
OR->>BT: Route request
BT->>M: Invoke model
M-->>BT: Response
BT-->>OR: Return result
OR-->>C: Response
C-->>U: Deliver output
alt Provider unavailable
Note over OR: No fallback due to allow_fallbacks=false
OR-->>C: Error returned
C-->>U: Surface error
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Disabled knowledge base sources:
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🧪 Early access (Sonnet 4.5): enabledWe are currently testing the Sonnet 4.5 model, which is expected to improve code review quality. However, this model may lead to increased noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience. Note:
Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @shunkakinoki, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly expands the range of AI models available by integrating several new providers and their specific models into the system's configuration. The update ensures that the platform can leverage a broader spectrum of AI capabilities, offering enhanced flexibility and choice for various applications. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds configurations for several new AI models. While the additions are functional, they introduce significant duplication in the configuration file. My review includes a suggestion to refactor the configuration to improve maintainability by removing this duplication.
Add new AI models and update existing configurations to include deepseek, moonshotai, openai, and qwen models with appropriate provider settings.