fix: rename fish test files to match function renames from #1057

[shunkakinoki]

Fixes failing shellspec tests caused by fish function renames in #1057.

The fish function files were renamed:

• _clxte_function.fish → _cltxe_function.fish
• _clxteh_function.fish → _cltxeh_function.fish
• _clxwe_function.fish → _clwxe_function.fish
• _clxweh_function.fish → _clwxeh_function.fish

But the corresponding test files were not renamed, causing 4 test failures in fish_functions_coverage_spec.sh.

---

Summary by cubic

Renamed four Fish test files to match function renames from #1057. This fixes the four failures in fish_functions_coverage_spec.sh and stabilizes CI.

^{Written for commit 5e63f65. Summary will update on new commits.}

[mesa-dot-dev]

You do not have enough credits to review this pull request. Please purchase more credits to continue.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@shunkakinoki has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: eecdced6-46ce-4c2a-a303-bfdabbd7cbb6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 577d6d6 and 5e63f65.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• spec/fish/_cltxe_function_test.fish
• spec/fish/_cltxeh_function_test.fish
• spec/fish/_clwxe_function_test.fish
• spec/fish/_clwxeh_function_test.fish

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/fish-test-rename

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses critical test failures within the Fish shell environment. It rectifies issues stemming from a prior refactoring (PR #1057) where core Fish functions were renamed, but their corresponding test files were not updated. The changes ensure that the test file names accurately reflect the current function names, thereby restoring the integrity and functionality of the test suite.

Highlights

• Test File Renames: Renamed four Fish shell test files (_clxte_function_test.fish, _clxteh_function_test.fish, _clxwe_function_test.fish, _clxweh_function_test.fish) to align with the updated function names introduced in a previous pull request (refactor(fish): correct abbreviation naming #1057).
• Test Fixes: Resolved 4 failing shellspec tests that were caused by the mismatch between old test file names and new function names.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[mesa-dot-dev]

Mesa Description

TL;DR

Fixes failing shellspec tests by renaming fish test files to match function renames from #1057.

What changed?

• Renamed _clxte_function.fish → _cltxe_function.fish
• Renamed _clxteh_function.fish → _cltxeh_function.fish
• Renamed _clxwe_function.fish → _clwxe_function.fish
• Renamed _clxweh_function.fish → _clwxeh_function.fish

^{Description generated by Mesa. Update settings}

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 4 files

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

No code changes or review comments were provided, so a summary cannot be generated.

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.