Repository navigation
[Perf] unified-memory: Free SWA segments without a host sync #43170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ch-wan
merged 1 commit into
sgl-project:main
from
caihuali95:mainline/unified-swa-free-no-host-sync
Oct 18, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[bug] Two-pool
evict_to_free_tokensstill flushes the old 3-tuple, so this new list is invisible there._flush_deferred_free_groupreturns whennot any(pending_groups). After this change,free_full_segmentqueues intofull_page_reps_groupinstead offree_page_reps_group(orfull_free_groupat page size 1). A group that only has those full-only segment frees is treated as empty on the two-pool path (UnifiedSWAAllocatorBase.evict_to_free_tokens) and left queued, soreclaim_plancan over-evict or fail while the pages are already waiting to be released. The tri-pool override goes through this method and is fine; gpt-oss is two-pool.Suggestion: Pass
self.full_page_reps_groupin the two-pool tuple as well, or share one pending-groups helper with this flush.