Skip to content

[LoRA] Restore GDN in_proj target-module choices lost in the rebase - #37466

Merged
yueming-yuan merged 1 commit into
sglang-milesfrom
yueming/restore-gdn-lora-target-choices
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

yueming-yuan merged 1 commit into
sglang-milesfrom
yueming/restore-gdn-lora-target-choices

Conversation

@yueming-yuan

@yueming-yuan yueming-yuan commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The v0.5.19 rebase of sglang-miles dropped in_proj_qkvz / in_proj_ba from SUPPORTED_LORA_TARGET_MODULES (the Inkling entries qkvr/wo_ud were carried over, the GDN ones were not). The runtime support is intact — lora.py still ships _normalize_in_proj_qkvz / _normalize_in_proj_ba — only the argparse choices went missing, so any --lora-target-modules in_proj_qkvz launch dies at ServerArgs parsing.

miles' GDN LoRA converter emits exactly these names (in_proj -> [in_proj_qkvz, in_proj_ba], used by the Qwen3.5-35B-A3B LoRA recipe on miles main), and miles CPU CI installs this branch's tip, so every miles PR currently fails TestLoraTargetModules::test_gdn_attention_targets_are_named_one_by_one.

Verified: with the two entries restored, that miles test class passes 5/5 (fails 1/5 without).


CI States

Latest PR Test (Base): ❌ Run #33551572792
Latest PR Test (Extra): ❌ Run #33551572623
Latest PR Test (AMD ROCm 7.2): ❌ Run #33551572745

@yueming-yuan
yueming-yuan force-pushed the yueming/restore-gdn-lora-target-choices branch from 05ffbcc to b185a44 Compare September 1, 2026 19:47
@yueming-yuan
yueming-yuan merged commit 98bb145 into sglang-miles Sep 1, 2026
80 of 90 checks passed
@yueming-yuan
yueming-yuan deleted the yueming/restore-gdn-lora-target-choices branch September 1, 2026 19:48
Kh4L pushed a commit to Kh4L/sglang that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2026
Zhichenzzz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2026
…rebase (#37466)

(cherry picked from commit 98bb145)
(cherry picked from commit 130fd57)
HJSang pushed a commit to HJSang/sglang that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2026
ziang-and pushed a commit to zianglih/sglang that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2026
…30499, sgl-project#37466, sgl-project#37887)

Co-authored-by: fzyzcjy <ch271828n@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: yueming-yuan <yym022502@gmail.com>
nv-hwoo pushed a commit to nv-hwoo/sglang that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2026
…30499, sgl-project#37466, sgl-project#37887)

Co-authored-by: fzyzcjy <ch271828n@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: yueming-yuan <yym022502@gmail.com>
Rockdu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2026
…, #37887)

Co-authored-by: fzyzcjy <ch271828n@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: yueming-yuan <yym022502@gmail.com>
Rockdu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2026
…, #37887)

Co-authored-by: fzyzcjy <ch271828n@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: yueming-yuan <yym022502@gmail.com>
Rockdu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2026
…, #37887)

Co-authored-by: fzyzcjy <ch271828n@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: yueming-yuan <yym022502@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant