Remove RoPE fallback vllm custom ops#13668
Remove RoPE fallback vllm custom ops#13668jinyouzhi wants to merge 2 commits intosgl-project:mainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jinyouzhi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request simplifies the Rotary Positional Embedding (RoPE) implementation by completely removing the reliance on VLLM custom operations. By eliminating the conditional fallback to vllm._custom_ops.rotary_embedding, the codebase becomes more consistent and easier to maintain, ensuring all RoPE applications utilize a single, dedicated kernel. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request removes the dependency on vllm._custom_ops for the RoPE fallback implementation. The change simplifies the code by always using the sgl_kernel's apply_rope_with_cos_sin_cache_inplace function in forward_cuda. While this is a good simplification, the fallback was previously used for CUDA devices with head sizes not in [64, 128, 256, 512]. The existing tests do not seem to cover these cases. I've added a comment to suggest adding test cases for these head sizes to prevent potential regressions.
Motivation
Try to remove vllm custom ops dependency.
#13328 (comment) cc @merrymercy
Modifications
Accuracy Tests
Benchmarking and Profiling
Checklist