Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new objc class macro #226

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2018
Merged

Use new objc class macro #226

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2018

Conversation

grovesNL
Copy link
Contributor

@grovesNL grovesNL commented Jul 16, 2018

This PR removes the class function in favor of the new class macro exposed by objc which caches access by class name. Note that this macro should eventually (through procedural macros) be able to link directly to the class.


This change is Reviewable

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 17, 2018

@bors-servo r+
Thanks!

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 82978bf has been approved by jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 82978bf with merge 2bea7c7...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2018
Use new objc class macro

This PR removes the `class` function in favor of the [new `class` macro exposed by objc](SSheldon/rust-objc#65) which caches access by class name. Note that this macro should eventually (through procedural macros) be able to link directly to the class.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/core-foundation-rs/226)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: jdm
Pushing 2bea7c7 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 82978bf into servo:master Jul 17, 2018
@grovesNL grovesNL deleted the class-macro branch June 12, 2019 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants