docs: finalize roadmap completion (#26)#92
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Cache: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Cache setting Disabled knowledge base sources:
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughREADME에 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/plans/2026-03-27-bandscope-roadmap-completion.md`:
- Around line 46-50: 현재 "Security Notes" 섹션에 CI/릴리스 게이트가 요구하는 하위섹션들이 누락되어 실패하므로
"Security Notes" 바로 아래에 정확한 섹션명으로 다음 헤더들을 추가하세요: attack surface, trust boundary,
mitigations, test points, realistic threats, remaining risk; 각 하위섹션에는 해당 항목에 대한
간단한 설명/요약(예: 공격 표면의 주요 입력/프로토콜, 신뢰 경계의 위치, 적용된 완화책 목록, 검증 가능한 테스트 포인트, 현실적인 위협
시나리오, 남아있는 위험 및 우선순위)을 채워 CI 체크가 요구하는 필드들이 모두 존재하도록 보장하세요.
In `@README.md`:
- Line 43: The README's claim "100% test coverage and 100% docstring coverage
across the TypeScript frontend and Python backend" is overstated; update that
sentence to a verifiable scope (e.g., specify which modules/packages are covered
or change to "current measured coverage" with percentages) or replace it with a
conditional note that full coverage will be enforced once CI gates are
implemented; locate the exact phrase in README.md and revise it to either (a)
specify the exact packages/files measured, or (b) soften to "measured coverage"
with numbers, and add a short TODO mentioning adding CI checks (coverage
thresholds and docstring checks) to enforce this in future.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 669cd01a-f44c-4146-94c8-6d432c600759
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mddocs/plans/2026-03-27-bandscope-roadmap-completion.md
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
1 similar comment
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
1 similar comment
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/plans/2026-03-27-bandscope-roadmap-completion.md`:
- Around line 48-69: Add a blank line after each level-3 heading to satisfy the
markdown style rule; specifically insert an empty line immediately below the
headings "Attack Surface", "Trust Boundary", "Mitigations", "Test Points",
"Realistic Threats", and "Remaining Risk" so each `###` title is followed by a
separating blank line before the paragraph or list that follows.
- Line 53: Replace the inaccurate phrase "Local IPC socket" with wording that
reflects the actual implementation: indicate that the UI communicates with the
Python analysis engine via a subprocess using stdin/stdout (e.g., "subprocess
stdio IPC" or "local process communication via subprocess stdin/stdout"); update
any sentence referencing an IPC socket to mention Command::new() and
Stdio::piped() spawning a subprocess and JSON message exchange over stdin/stdout
(used by the Tauri backend and the analysis engine CLI) so the document matches
the real mechanism.
In `@README.md`:
- Line 43: README.md's claim that "apps/desktop frontend components" have 100%
measured test/docstring coverage is misleading because vite.config.ts currently
enforces the 100% threshold only for src/App.tsx and src/lib/export.ts; either
update README.md to explicitly state that the enforced threshold applies only to
those two files (src/App.tsx and src/lib/export.ts) or change vite.config.ts to
expand the enforced coverage pattern to all desktop components (e.g., use
broader glob patterns covering src/**/*.tsx and src/**/*.ts under the
apps/desktop package) and, if you want to keep the "docstring" claim for the
TypeScript frontend, add/configure a JSDoc/TypeDoc coverage or linting step and
corresponding threshold (or remove the docstring claim); make the README entry
precise and reflect whichever option you implement.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d826dee6-22de-47ea-973f-e5dbd5baa010
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mddocs/plans/2026-03-27-bandscope-roadmap-completion.md
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
Dismissing as addressed and confirmed by CodeRabbit
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
2 similar comments
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
1 similar comment
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
3 similar comments
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
Fixes #26
This PR finalizes the core implementation roadmap. All 13 child epics of Issue #26 have been closed and merged successfully, taking BandScope from a skeleton to a fully-functioning offline rehearsal-analysis tool.
docs/plans/2026-03-27-bandscope-roadmap-completion.mdas the official completion record.README.mdto reflect the current status (completed baseline, 100% coverage, functional export and edit).📝 Walkthrough
개요
BandScope의 핵심 구현 백로그 완료 상태를 문서화하는 두 개의 마크다운 파일을 추가했습니다. README에 현재 상태 섹션을 추가하고, 로드맵 완료 계획 문서를 새로 생성하여 이슈
#26의마일스톤과 보안 고려사항을 기록했습니다.변경사항
README.md,docs/plans/2026-03-27-bandscope-roadmap-completion.md예상 코드 리뷰 노력
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3분
관련 가능성이 있는 PR
시