Skip to content

Conversation

@transphorm
Copy link
Member

@transphorm transphorm commented Sep 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Incremented Android build number from 104 to 105 to prepare the next app build.
  • Notes

    • No user-facing changes in this release.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Incremented Android build number in app/version.json from 104 to 105. No other fields or structures changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Android build bump
app/version.json
Updated android.build value: 104 → 105; no other modifications

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Tick tock, build clocks roll to 105,
A quiet nudge to keep releases alive.
No code paths twist, no features strive—
Just version sails set for the next drive.
Onward, shipmates, to Play Store skies! 🚀

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch justin/fix-android-build-number-105

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50f670d and b4eac8a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/version.json (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@transphorm transphorm merged commit 2bcb9f4 into dev Sep 30, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@transphorm transphorm deleted the justin/fix-android-build-number-105 branch September 30, 2025 23:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants