-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add FAQ about destination filters #6634
Conversation
src/connections/test-connections.md
Outdated
#### Why are my destination filters being ignored? | ||
|
||
Events passed into the Event Tester bypass destination filters. Destination filters are applied to events as they are sent to specific destinations based on your configuration. However, the Event Tester is designed to help you troubleshoot your Sources, their configuration, and their downstream destinations by showing a sample of the data available. It allows you to check that data is being sent, and that it's in the correct format without the filters being applied. This means that when you use the Event Tester, you're seeing the data before any destination filters or other processing rules are applied, providing a clear view of the raw event data as it comes from the source. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"based on your configuration" - is this referring only to the destination filters, or does this refer to all tools that someone could enable to impact delivery (integrations object, consent management, etc.?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Destination filters would only apply to events that are passed to the destination, so this would be regardless of other tools that impact how data is sent downstream. Reviewing it, I can see that this line is a little confusing so we could remove the 'based on your configuration' rather than explaining further to keep it simple.
Thank you for your contribution! Your pull request is merged, but may take a day or two to appear on the site. |
Proposed changes
We occasionally get questions about why the event tester is not accounting for destination filters. The event tester bypasses these filters and is not designed to test for them. I added an FAQ to the docs to cover this topic.
Merge timing
Related issues (optional)
n/a